Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31874887›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

The Choice and Partnership Approach to community mental health and addictions services: a realist-informed scoping review protocol.

Leslie Anne Campbell, Sharon E Clark, Caitlyn Ayn, Jill Chorney, Debbie Emberly, Julie MacDonald, Adrian MacKenzie, Daniel Marsh, Kylie Peacock, Lori Wozney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Leslie Anne CampbellCommunity Health & Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada leslie.anne.campbell@dal.ca.
Sharon E ClarkMental Health and Addictions, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Caitlyn AynCommunity Health & Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5114-2904
Jill ChorneyMental Health and Addictions, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Debbie EmberlyMental Health and Addictions, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Julie MacDonaldMental Health and Addictions, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Sydney, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Adrian MacKenzieCommunity Health & Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Daniel MarshAdministration, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Kylie PeacockCommunity Health & Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Lori WozneyMental Health and Addictions, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEarly identification and appropriate treatment of child and adolescent mental health disorders can often be hampered by patchwork services with poorly planned or unclear pathways. The Choice and Partnership Approach (CAPA) is an evidence-based transformational model of community (community-based or outpatient) mental health and addictions services for children and adolescents that aims to better match services to needs and to improve timely access to care. CAPA has been variably implemented across jurisdictions but has not been comprehensively evaluated for its impact on system and client outcomes. Our research question is, 'To what degree does CAPA work, for whom and under what circumstances?'. The purpose of this review is twofold: (1) to gain an understanding of the extent and outcomes of the implementation of CAPA in community mental health and addictions services; and (2) to identify the role of context as it influences the implementation of CAPA and resulting client and system outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a realist-informed scoping review of the literature related to CAPA in either child and adolescent or adult community mental health and addictions services. Relevant studies, reports and documentation will be identified by searching the following online databases: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Academic Search Premier, ERIC, Web of Science, Cochrane, Dissertations Abstracts, NCBI Bookshelf, PubMed Central and the Canadian Health Research Collection. The search strategy was developed by a health sciences library scientist and informed by a multidisciplinary team comprising methodological and content knowledge experts. The search will gather evidence from multiple online databases of peer-reviewed literature and grey literature repositories. All articles will be independently assessed for inclusion by pairs of reviewers. The key themes derived from a thematic analysis of extracted data will be presented in a narrative overview. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Research ethics review is not required for this scoping review. The results will be disseminated through meetings with stakeholders (including clients and families, clinicians and decision-makers), conference presentations and peer-reviewed publication. The results of this review will inform an overarching programme of research, policy and quality indicator development to ultimately improve mental health and addictions care and subsequent mental health outcomes for children and adolescents.

Indexed as

Addiction MedicineAdolescentChildCommunity Mental Health CentersHumansNeeds AssessmentScoping Reviews as Topicchild/adolescent mental health serviceschoice and partnership approachhealth system transformationimplementation science

Identifiers

PMID31874887
PMCPMC7008451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.