Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31874882›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Efficacy of periacetabular osteotomy followed by progressive resistance training compared to progressive resistance training as non-surgical treatment in patients with hip dysplasia (PreserveHip) - a protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Lisa Cecilie Urup Reimer, Stig Storgaard Jakobsen, Louise Mortensen, Ulrik Dalgas, Julie Sandell Jacobsen, Kjeld Soballe, Tone Bere, Jan Erik Madsen, Lars Nordsletten, May Arna Risberg and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03941171 (The Effect of PAO Followed by Progressive Resistance Training Versus Progressive Resistance Training in Patients With Hip Dysplasia. A Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03941171 nacompletednot on this map

The Effect of PAO Followed by Progressive Resistance Training Versus Progressive Resistance Training in Patients With Hip Dysplasia. A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2019 to 2025Enrolled69ConditionsHip DysplasiaArmsPAO, Usual care after PAO, PRT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lisa Cecilie Urup ReimerOrthopedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark lisareimer@clin.au.dk.ORCID 0000-0003-4666-4622
Stig Storgaard JakobsenOrthopedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Louise MortensenOrthopedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Ulrik DalgasPublic Health - Sport, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Julie Sandell JacobsenPhysiotherapy & Research Centre for Health and Welfare Technology, Programme for Rehabilitation, VIA University College, Aarhus, Denmark.
Kjeld SoballeOrthopedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Tone BereOrthopedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Jan Erik MadsenOrthopedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Lars NordslettenOrthopedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
May Arna RisbergOrthopedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Inger MechlenburgOrthopedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeriacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is an established treatment for adolescent and adult patients with hip dysplasia. However, the efficacy of PAO has not been tested against another surgical intervention or conservative treatment in a randomised controlled trial before. We suggest that progressive resistance training (PRT) could be an alternative to PAO. The primary aim of this trial is therefore to examine the efficacy of PAO followed by 4 months of usual care followed by 8 months of PRT compared to 12 months of solely PRT in patients with hip dysplasia eligible for PAO in terms of patient-reported pain measured by The Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This trial is a single-blinded multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial, where patients with hip dysplasia, who are eligible for PAO, will be randomised to either PAO followed by usual care and PRT or PRT only. Primary outcome is patient-reported pain, measured on the subscale pain on the HAGOS questionnaire 12 months after initiation of PAO or PRT. The key secondary outcomes are the other subscales of the HAGOS, adverse and serious adverse events, usage of painkillers (yes/no) and type of analgesics. Based on the sample size calculation, the trial needs to include 96 patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial is approved by the Central Denmark Region Committee on Biomedical Research Ethics (Journal No 1-10-72-234-18) and by the Danish Data Protection Agency (Journal No 1-16-02-120-19). The trial is also approved by The Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics, Region South-East Norway (Ref. 2018/1603). All results from this trial will be published in international peer-reviewed scientific journals regardless of whether the results are positive, negative or inconclusive. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03941171.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHip DislocationHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicOsteotomyPain MeasurementPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResistance TrainingSingle-Blind MethodYoung Adulthiphip dysplasiaosteoarthritisPAOperiacetabular osteotomyprogressive resistance training

Identifiers

PMID31874882
PMCPMC7008423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.