Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31874876›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Validation study of randomly selected cases of PTSD diagnoses identified in a Swedish regional database compared with medical records: is the validity sufficient for epidemiological research?

Anna-Clara Hollander, Klara Askegård, Claudia Iddon-Escalante, Emily A Holmes, Susanne Wicks, Christina Dalman

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna-Clara HollanderDepartment of Global Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden anna-clara.hollander@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0002-1246-5804
Klara AskegårdPsykiatri Södra, Administration, Stockholm, Sweden.
Claudia Iddon-EscalantePsykiatri Södra, Administration, Stockholm, Sweden.
Emily A HolmesDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Susanne WicksDepartment of Global Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Christina DalmanDepartment of Global Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn Sweden, the patients' diagnoses are recorded in administrative registers. The research value of these registers is determined by their diagnostic validity, that is, if the diagnosis recorded meets the relevant diagnostic criteria. The aim of the study was to assess the validity of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)-diagnoses as compared with case notes in medical records (MRs) and to test if there was a difference in validity by gender, migration status and those with and without psychotic symptoms. We hypothesised that the validity would be sufficient, using both DESIGN AND

settingA validation of the register-diagnoses using MRs from treatment centres within the Region of Stockholm to examine whether patients with a register-diagnosis of PTSD fulfilled DSM criteria of PTSD according to the case notes in their MRs.

participantsA random sample of 187 patients aged 18-64, who had been diagnosed with PTSD (F43.1 in the ICD-10) were drawn from the Region of Stockholm's MR database 2013-2015. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Validity of the PTSD diagnoses according to DSM-IV and DSM-5 as proportions of true positives with 95% CI.

resultsThe hypothesised sufficient validity of the PTSD diagnoses was confirmed. Although the point-estimates for DSM-IV were higher than for DSM-5, the hypothesis that there would be significant differences in validity between DSM-IV and DSM-5 was not confirmed. There were no significant validity differences by gender, migration status and for those with and without psychotic symptoms.

conclusionsThis study has found that validity of the PTSD diagnoses in the register of the Region of Stockholm to be sufficient for epidemiological research.

Indexed as

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersEmigrants and ImmigrantsEpidemiologic StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMedical RecordsRandom AllocationRegistriesStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticSwedenepidemiologypsychiatrypublic health

Identifiers

PMID31874876
PMCPMC7008445
OpenAlexW2998224910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.