Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31874867›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2019

Pregnancy decisions after fetal or perinatal death: systematic review of qualitative research.

Eleanor Dyer, Ruth Bell, Ruth Graham, Judith Rankin

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Impact of Perinatal Death on the Social and Family Context of the Parents.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eleanor DyerPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4797-1459
Ruth BellPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8464-8933
Ruth GrahamSchool of Geography, Sociology and Politics, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9432-760X
Judith RankinPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK judith.rankin@ncl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5355-454X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo synthesise the findings of qualitative research exploring parents' experiences, views and decisions about becoming pregnant following a perinatal death or fetal loss.

designSystematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ASSIA, Embase, PUBMED, Scopus and Google Scholar. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Nine electronic databases were searched using predefined search terms. Articles published in English, in peer-reviewed journals, using qualitative methods to explore the experiences and attitudes of bereaved parents following perinatal or fetal loss, were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Qualitative data relating to first-order and second-order constructs were extracted and synthesised across studies using a thematic analysis.

results15 studies were included. Four descriptive themes and 10 subthemes were identified. The descriptive themes were: deciding about subsequent pregnancy, diversity of reactions to the event, social network influences, and planning or timing of subsequent pregnancy. The decision to become pregnant after death is complex and varies between individuals and sometimes within couples. Decisions are often made quickly, in the immediate aftermath of a pregnancy loss, but may evolve over time. Bereaved parents may feel isolated from social networks.

conclusionsThere is an opportunity to support parents to prepare for a pregnancy after a fetal or perinatal loss, and conversations may be welcomed at an early stage. Health professionals may play an important role providing support lacking from usual social networks. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018112839.

Indexed as

Decision MakingPerinatal DeathAttitude to HealthCommunicationFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMental HealthParentsPregnancyQualitative Researchmental healthobstetricsperinatologyqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID31874867
PMCPMC7008435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.