ArticleBMJ health & care informatics2019
Recording problems and diagnoses in clinical care: developing guidance for healthcare professionals and system designers.
Article in BMJ health & care informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current state of electronic problems lists in primary care: a rapid scoping review.Family practice · 2026Article
- Clinical evaluation of MiADE: a natural language processing system for assisting structured diagnosis recording at the point of care.BMJ health & care informatics · 2026Article
- Challenges for a Maternal-Care Health Recommender System in Indonesia: Formative Preimplementation Qualitative Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Design and implementation of a natural language processing system at the point of care: MiADE (medical information AI data extractor).BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a self-updating gout register from electronic health records data.RMD open · 2024Article
- Real-world Chinese herbal medicine for Parkinson's disease: a hospital-based retrospective analysis of electronic medical records.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2024Article
- Article
- Severe mental illness, common mental disorders, and neurodevelopmental conditions amongst 9088 lower court attendees in London, UK.BMC psychiatry · 2022Article
- Children's and young People's diabetes services: What works well and what doesn't?Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Data gaps in electronic health record (EHR) systems: An audit of problem list completeness during the COVID-19 pandemic.International journal of medical informatics · 2021Article
- Consultation analysis: use of free text versus coded text.Health and technology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate recording of problems and diagnoses in health records is key to safe and effective patient care, yet it is often done poorly. Electronic health record systems vary in their functionality and ease of use, and are not optimally designed for easy recording and sharing of clinical information. There is a lack of professional consensus and guidance on how problems and diagnoses should be recorded.
methodsThe Professional Record Standards Body commissioned work led by the Royal College of Physicians Health Informatics Unit to carry out a literature review, draft guidance, carry out an online consultation and round table discussion, and produce a report including recommendations for systems. A patient workshop was held to explore patient preferences for mechanisms for sharing diagnosis information between primary and secondary care.
resultsConsensus was reached among medical specialties on key elements of diagnosis recording, and draft guidance was produced ready for piloting in a variety of care settings. Patients were keen for better ways for diagnosis information to be shared. DISCUSSION: Improving the recording of diagnoses and problems will require a major effort of which the new guidance is only a part. The guidance needs to be embedded in training, and clinical systems need to have improved, standardised functionality. Front-line clinicians, specialist societies, clinical informaticians and patients need to be engaged in developing information models for diagnoses to support care and research, accessible via user-friendly interfaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.