ArticleEuropean urology2020
Role of Changes in Magnetic Resonance Imaging or Clinical Stage in Evaluation of Disease Progression for Men with Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance.
Article in European urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between baseline prostate MRI PI-RADS classification and risk of Gleason upgrade during active surveillance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of urology · 2026Pooled it
- Incorporating Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biomarkers in Active Surveillance Protocols - Results From the Prospective Stockholm3 Active Surveillance Trial (STHLM3AS).Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2021Trial
- Noninvasive Urine Test Predicts Grade Group Upgrading in Patients on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: Multisite Validation and Comparison with MRI.The Journal of urology · 2026Article
- Micro-UltraSound In Cancer - Active Surveillance (MUSIC-AS): A paired, prospective, non-inferiority trial comparing micro-ultrasound and multiparametric MRI at confirmatory biopsy.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2026Article
- The Impact of Endpoint Definitions on Predictors of Progression in Active Surveillance for Early Prostate Cancer.Cancers · 2026Article
- Combined MYC Activation and PTEN Loss Drives Molecular Features of Aggressive Preinvasive Lesions in Mouse Prostate.Molecular cancer research : MCR · 2026Article
- AI in Prostate MRI: A Task-Based Review.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2025Review
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging at Second Surveillance Biopsy After Diagnosis in Patients With Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer in the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study.The Journal of urology · 2025Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging for long-term active surveillance biopsy decision-making.BJU international · 2025Article
- Evolution of Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer: Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Biopsy, and Focal Therapy.The Journal of urology · 2025Article
- MRI and active surveillance: thoughts from across the pond.European radiology · 2025Review
- Evaluating 4Kscore's role in predicting progression on active surveillance for prostate cancer independently of clinical information and PIRADS score.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025Article
- Assessing the Molecular Heterogeneity of Prostate Cancer Biopsy Sampling: Insights from the MAST Trial.European urology focus · 2025Article
- Prospective comparison of restriction spectrum imaging and non-invasive biomarkers to predict upgrading on active surveillance prostate biopsy.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2024Article
- Application of Advanced Imaging to Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Management: A Narrative Review of Current Practice and Unanswered Questions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- The evolving landscape: magnetic resonance imaging in active surveillance for prostate cancer management.Frontiers in urology · 2024Review
- Outcomes and predictors of clinically significant prostate cancer detection by transperineal computer fusion biopsy during active surveillance.Central European journal of urology · 2024Article
- Article
- Review
- mpMRI Interpretation in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer-An overview of the PRECISE score.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundActive surveillance (AS) protocols rely on rectal examination, prostate-specific antigen, imaging, and biopsy to identify disease progression.
objectiveTo evaluate whether an AS regimen based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or clinical stage changes can detect reclassification to grade group (GG) ≥2 disease compared with scheduled systematic biopsies. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsWe identified a cohort of men initiated on AS between January 2013 and April 2016 at a single tertiary-care center. Patients completed confirmatory testing and prostate MRI prior to enrollment, then underwent laboratory and physical evaluation every 6 mo, MRI every 18 mo, and biopsy every 3yr. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: MRI results were evaluated using composite Likert/Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v2 scoring. MRI and clinical changes were assessed for association with disease progression. Univariable and multivariable regression models were used to predict upgrading on 3-yr biopsy. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: At 3yr, of 207 men, 66 (32%) had≥GG2 at biopsy: 55 (83%) with GG2, 10 (15%) with GG3, and one (1.5%) with GG4. Among patients with a 3-yr MRI score of ≥3, 41% had≥GG2 disease, compared with 15% with an MRI score of <3 (p=0.0002). The MRI score increased in 48 men (23%), decreased in 27 (13%), and was unchanged in 132 (64%) men. Increases in MRI score were not associated with reclassification after adjusting for the 3-yr MRI score (p=0.9). Biopsying only for an increased MRI score or clinical stage would avoid 681 biopsies per 1000 men, at the cost of missing ≥GG2 disease in 169 patients.
conclusionsAn AS strategy that uses MRI or clinical changes to trigger prostate biopsy avoids many biopsies but misses an unacceptable amount of clinically significant disease. Prostate biopsy for men on AS should be performed at scheduled intervals, regardless of stable imaging or examination findings. PATIENT SUMMARY: An active surveillance strategy for biopsy based only on increases in magnetic resonance imaging score or clinical stage will avoid many biopsies; however, it will miss many patients with clinically significant prostate cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.