Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31874609›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019

DDIGIP: predicting drug-drug interactions based on Gaussian interaction profile kernels.

Cheng Yan, Guihua Duan, Yi Pan, Fang-Xiang Wu, Jianxin Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Drug-Drug Interactions Prediction Using Fingerprint Only.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Machine Learning in Drug Metabolism Study.Current drug metabolism · 2022
    Article
  9. Machine learning in the prediction of cancer therapy.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Cheng YanSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, 932 South Lushan Rd, ChangSha, 410083, China.
Guihua DuanSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, 932 South Lushan Rd, ChangSha, 410083, China.
Yi PanDepartment of Computer Science, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA30302, USA.
Fang-Xiang WuBiomedical Engineering and Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SKS7N5A9, Canada.
Jianxin WangSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, 932 South Lushan Rd, ChangSha, 410083, China. jxwang@mail.csu.edu.cn.
Central South University · CNGeorgia State University · USQiannan Normal College For Nationalities · CNUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 61772552
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA drug-drug interaction (DDI) is defined as a drug effect modified by another drug, which is very common in treating complex diseases such as cancer. Many studies have evidenced that some DDIs could be an increase or a decrease of the drug effect. However, the adverse DDIs maybe result in severe morbidity and even morality of patients, which also cause some drugs to withdraw from the market. As the multi-drug treatment becomes more and more common, identifying the potential DDIs has become the key issue in drug development and disease treatment. However, traditional biological experimental methods, including in vitro and vivo, are very time-consuming and expensive to validate new DDIs. With the development of high-throughput sequencing technology, many pharmaceutical studies and various bioinformatics data provide unprecedented opportunities to study DDIs.

resultIn this study, we propose a method to predict new DDIs, namely DDIGIP, which is based on Gaussian Interaction Profile (GIP) kernel on the drug-drug interaction profiles and the Regularized Least Squares (RLS) classifier. In addition, we also use the k-nearest neighbors (KNN) to calculate the initial relational score in the presence of new drugs via the chemical, biological, phenotypic data of drugs. We compare the prediction performance of DDIGIP with other competing methods via the 5-fold cross validation, 10-cross validation and de novo drug validation. CONLUSION: In 5-fold cross validation and 10-cross validation, DDRGIP method achieves the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.9600 and 0.9636 which are better than state-of-the-art method (L1 Classifier ensemble method) of 0.9570 and 0.9599. Furthermore, for new drugs, the AUC value of DDIGIP in de novo drug validation reaches 0.9262 which also outperforms the other state-of-the-art method (Weighted average ensemble method) of 0.9073. Case studies and these results demonstrate that DDRGIP is an effective method to predict DDIs while being beneficial to drug development and disease treatment.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArea Under CurveCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyDrug InteractionsLeast-Squares AnalysisDrugDrug-drug interactionGaussian interaction profileRLS

Identifiers

PMID31874609
PMCPMC6929542
OpenAlexW2997277473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.