ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019
Research on predicting 2D-HP protein folding using reinforcement learning with full state space.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research on RNA secondary structure predicting via bidirectional recurrent neural network.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Identifying Membrane Protein Types Based on Lifelong Learning With Dynamically Scalable Networks.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProtein structure prediction has always been an important issue in bioinformatics. Prediction of the two-dimensional structure of proteins based on the hydrophobic polarity model is a typical non-deterministic polynomial hard problem. Currently reported hydrophobic polarity model optimization methods, greedy method, brute-force method, and genetic algorithm usually cannot converge robustly to the lowest energy conformations. Reinforcement learning with the advantages of continuous Markov optimal decision-making and maximizing global cumulative return is especially suitable for solving global optimization problems of biological sequences.
resultsIn this study, we proposed a novel hydrophobic polarity model optimization method derived from reinforcement learning which structured the full state space, and designed an energy-based reward function and a rigid overlap detection rule. To validate the performance, sixteen sequences were selected from the classical data set. The results indicated that reinforcement learning with full states successfully converged to the lowest energy conformations against all sequences, while the reinforcement learning with partial states folded 50% sequences to the lowest energy conformations. Reinforcement learning with full states hits the lowest energy on an average 5 times, which is 40 and 100% higher than the three and zero hit by the greedy algorithm and reinforcement learning with partial states respectively in the last 100 episodes.
conclusionsOur results indicate that reinforcement learning with full states is a powerful method for predicting two-dimensional hydrophobic-polarity protein structure. It has obvious competitive advantages compared with greedy algorithm and reinforcement learning with partial states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.