Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31874256›Full record

ReviewNeuroImage2020

The balance of rigor and reality in developmental neuroscience.

Jessica F Cantlon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NeuroImage, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Entropy, complexity, and maturity in children's neural responses to naturalistic video lessons.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Opportunities and Limitations of Mobile Neuroimaging Technologies in Educational Neuroscience.Mind, brain and education : the official journal of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jessica F CantlonCarnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, United States. Electronic address: jcantlon@andrew.cmu.edu.

Funding

The Development of Number Words in the Human BrainR01HD091104 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI CANTLON, JESSICA F · 2017 to 2021
$1.5M
The Neural Organization of Quantitative Concepts in Early ChildhoodR01HD064636 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI CANTLON, JESSICA F · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD064636NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD091104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The balance realism and rigor in psychological research is essential to the development of rich and accurate theories about the developing brain. In the field of neuroimaging researchers have used predominantly controlled laboratory methods to decompose neural signals into meaningful functions but there is currently a push to integrate naturalistic conditions into neural measurement. Sometimes naturalistic methods are used to validate existing functional theories ecologically, and other times they are used in data-driven studies for exploration. This article assesses the value and risk of these approaches for understanding the developing brain.

Indexed as

BrainChildChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolCognitionHumansNeurosciencesPhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID31874256
PMCPMC8276520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.