Trial reportJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2020
Class effect of xanthine oxidase inhibitors on flow-mediated dilatation in hypertensive patients: A randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of urate-lowering therapies in asymptomatic hyperuricaemia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of key clinical outcomes.Annals of medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative effects of topiroxostat and febuxostat on arterial properties in hypertensive patients with hyperuricemia.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2021Trial
- Class effect of xanthine oxidase inhibitors on flow-mediated dilatation in hypertensive patients: A randomized controlled trial.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2020Trial
- Endothelial Function Biomarkers in Hypertension.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- The HOPE Asia Network activity for "zero" cardiovascular events in Asia: Overview 2020.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A direct comparison of the effects of febuxostat and allopurinol on flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) will help to clarify which agent provides a better reduction of cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients. Hypertensive patients with hyperuricemia were randomized into a febuxostat (10-40 mg, n = 33) or allopurinol (100-200 mg, n = 31) group and followed up for 6 months. Both the febuxostat (7.9 ± 1.3 mg/dL vs 5.6 ± 1.0 mg/dL, P < .001) and allopurinol (8.2 ± 1.3 mg/dL vs 6.1 ± 1.0 mg/dL, P < .001) groups exhibited significant reductions in uric acid after treatment. There was no significant difference in the change in FMD between the two treatment groups (0.6 ± 2.6% vs 0.2 ± 2.3%, P = .504). However, stratified analysis showed that febuxostat achieved a significantly greater change in FMD compared to allopurinol in the elderly group (1.3 ± 2.9% vs -0.7%±1.8%, P = .047). There was no difference in the improvement of FMD between febuxostat and allopurinol, but febuxostat may provide an improvement of FMD in elderly people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.