Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31873917›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2020

Utility of PET/CT in patients with stage I-III melanoma.

J A Avilés Izquierdo, I Molina López, P Sobrini Morillo, I Márquez Rodas, E Mercader Cidoncha

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Journal of surgical oncology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J A Avilés IzquierdoServicio de Dermatología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Calle Dr Esquerdo 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain. jaavilesizquierdo@gmail.com.
I Molina LópezServicio de Dermatología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Calle Dr Esquerdo 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
P Sobrini MorilloFacultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
I Márquez RodasServicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon and Ciberonc, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2476-668X
E Mercader CidonchaServicio de Cirugía General, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo study the utility of positron emission tomography with computerized tomography (PET/CT) in patients with a stage I-III melanoma. PATIENTS AND

methodsPET/CT findings from all patients with a stage I-III melanoma attended at our hospital from September 2011 to November 2015 were reviewed.

resultsData from 83 patients with a stage I-III melanoma, 39 patients with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and 35 patients with locoregional recurrences were analyzed. Sensitivity of PET/CT in clinical stage I-III patients was 5%, with a 14% of false positives. In patients with a positive SLNB, PET/CT previous to complete lymph node dissection had a 23% of false negatives. In patients with clinical locoregional recurrences, PET/CT findings revealed asymptomatic visceral distant metastasis in 25.7%.

conclusionsPET/CT has a significant rate of false positive and negative results in patients with a stage I-III melanoma. Utility in patients with nodal locoregional recurrences seems higher than in patients with skin metastases.

Indexed as

Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographySentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFalse Negative ReactionsFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleHumansLymph Node ExcisionMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityComplete lymph node dissectionDiagnosisMelanomaPET/CTSentinel lymph node biopsySkin metastasesStaging

Identifiers

PMID31873917
OpenAlexW2996097285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.