ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2020
Hidden shot pellets on postmortem computed tomography and their utilization for radiologic identification of decedents.
Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The current state of forensic imaging - post mortem imaging.International journal of legal medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We describe the case of a decomposed male cadaver found in an apartment who was transported to our institute for identification purposes. Computed tomography (CT) was performed to assess the possibility of a radiologic identification of the decedent (RadID) by dental implants or orthopedic implants. Surprisingly, the CT examination revealed seven spherical foreign bodies (diameter: 0.4 to 0.5 cm / 0.16 to 0.20 in) and one flat foreign body (diameter: 0.7 cm / 0.28 in; thickness 0.2 cm / 0.08 in) inside the cadaver. The foreign bodies were located extracranially in the soft tissue of the head (n = 1), the neck (n = 2), the abdomen (n = 2), the right upper arm (n = 1) and both thighs (n = 2) and were determined to be shot pellets according to their shape and high radiopacity. Immediately, the decedent was externally reexamined for entrance wounds according to the location of the shot pellets on CT. A thorough external examination revealed scarred entrance wounds on the head and neck. For the identification of the decedent, radiologic data from the renter of the apartment were requested from the municipal hospital. The radiology department provided a clinical CT scan of the abdomen of the suspected person, a 70-year-old man. An antemortem abdomen CT also demonstrated two shot pellets at the same location in the body. The decedent was radiologically identified by comparing the position of the retained shot pellets on antemortem and postmortem computed tomography. This case report presents a rare case of numerous retained shot pellets and the extraordinary RadID based on these retained shot pellets, which were only revealed because a postmortem CT scan was performed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.