ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020
Comparison of plasma membrane H
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- MnPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Pan-metagenome reveals the abiotic stress resistome of cigar tobacco phyllosphere microbiome.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- The root apoplastic pH as an integrator of plant signaling.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Regulation of Cytosolic pH: The Contributions of Plant Plasma Membrane HInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Exogenous CaPlanta · 2021Article
- Acid resistance of Masson pine (Pinus massoniana Lamb.) families and their root morphology and physiological response to simulated acid deposition.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Acid rain is a global environmental issue due to inhibiting severely plant growth and productivity. To discover the tolerant mechanism in plants under acid rain stress, we studied the difference in response of two crops (rice and soybean) to simulated acid rain (pH 5.0 ~ 2.5) at growth and physiological, biochemical and molecular levels during exposure and recovery periods by hydroponics. By analyzing the change in relative growth rate, chlorophyll content and plasma permeability in rice and soybean, we found that rice could tolerate acid rain above pH 3.0 whereas soybean could tolerate acid rain above pH 4.5. By RT-PCR analyses, immunoprecipitation and enzyme kinetics study, we observed that pH 4.5 acid rain promoted the transcriptional expression of H
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.