Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31873863›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2020

Intestinal carriage of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae at admission in a Portuguese hospital.

Marta Aires-de-Sousa, Elizeth Lopes, Maria Luísa Gonçalves, Ana Luísa Pereira, Augusto Machado E Costa, Hermínia de Lencastre, Laurent Poirel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Does selective digestive decontamination (SDD) increase antibiotic resistance? Long-term comparison of two intensive care units (with and without SDD) of the same tertiary hospital.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. ESBL- and Carbapenemase-ProducingMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  12. Genotypic and Phenotypic Characterization of PathogenicInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Dissemination of High-Risk ClonesMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  14. Urban Pigeons (Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Prevalence and Characterization of ESBL/AmpC ProducingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marta Aires-de-SousaEscola Superior de Saúde da Cruz Vermelha Portuguesa (ESSCVP), Avenida de Ceuta, No 1, Edifício UrbiCeuta, 1300-906, Lisbon, Portugal. msousa@esscvp.eu.
Elizeth LopesLaboratory of Molecular Genetics, Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier (ITQB), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Oeiras, Portugal.
Maria Luísa GonçalvesLaboratory of Microbiology, Hospital SAMS, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ana Luísa PereiraLaboratory of Microbiology, Hospital SAMS, Lisbon, Portugal.
Augusto Machado E CostaDepartment of Medicine, Hospital SAMS, Lisbon, Portugal.
Hermínia de LencastreLaboratory of Molecular Genetics, Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier (ITQB), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Oeiras, Portugal.
Laurent PoirelMedical and Molecular Microbiology Unit, Faculty of Science and Medicine, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.

Funding

Centro de Investigação em Ciências Sociais (PT) LISBOA-01-0145-FEDER-016417COMPETE2020 - Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização (POCI) LISBOA-01-0145-FEDER-007660Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa PTDC/DTP-EPI/0842/2014Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung FNS-31003A_163432Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung FNS-407240_177381
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the prevalence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae fecal carriers at admission in a Portuguese hospital and to determine the epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance patterns of ESBL-producing isolates. During a 2-month period, rectal swabs were collected at hospital admission from 151 at-risk patients. In addition, 48 rectal swabs were obtained from weekly screenings of 37 patients hospitalized for > 48 h. All ESBL/carbapenemase-producing isolates were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility and characterized by PFGE and MLST. The prevalence of ESBL producers at hospital admission was 17% and 24% among at-risk patients hospitalized for > 48 h, while the prevalence of carbapenemase producers was 3% in both cases. Most of the isolates were Escherichia coli (54%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (41%). The most common ESBL identified was CTX-M-15 (n = 17/34; 50%), followed by CTX-M-27 (n = 10; 29%), CTX-M-33 (n = 4; 12%), SHV-12 (n = 2), and CTX-M-55 (n = 1). The 20 E. coli isolates were distributed into 16 PFGE types and nine sequence types (ST), with 60% of the isolates belonging to ST131. The 15 K. pneumoniae were grouped into 12 PFGE types and nine STs, with three STs (ST17, ST449, ST147) corresponding to 60% of the isolates. A high proportion of isolates showed resistance to ciprofloxacin (86%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (68%), tobramycin (57%), and gentamicin (43%). All isolates remained susceptible to fosfomycin. A high prevalence of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae was found at hospital admission among at-risk patients and > 50% of the isolates showed resistance to first-line antibiotics for the treatment of lower urinary tract infections, leaving fosfomycin as an alternative.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesCarrier StateEnterobacteriaceaeEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsEscherichia coli InfectionsFecesHospitalizationHumansIntestinesKlebsiella InfectionsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPortugalPrevalenceProspective StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesEnterobacteriaceaeESBLEscherichia coliHospital admissionKlebsiella pneumoniaePortugal

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.