ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2020
A Novel Nonlinear System Identification for Cerebral Autoregulation in Human: Computer Simulation and Validation.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Time-domain methods for quantifying dynamic cerebral blood flow autoregulation: Review and recommendations. A white paper from the Cerebrovascular Research Network (CARNet).Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2024Review
- Lower dynamic cerebral autoregulation following acute bout of low-volume high-intensity interval exercise in chronic stroke compared to healthy adults.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cerebral autoregulation in healthy humans was studied using a novel methodology adapted from Bendat nonlinear analysis technique. A computer simulation of a high-pass filter in parallel with a cubic nonlinearity followed by a low-pass filter was analyzed. A linear system transfer function analysis showed an incorrect estimate of the gain, cut-off frequency, and phase of the high-pass filter. By contrast, using our nonlinear systems identification, yielded the correct gain, cut-off frequency, and phase of the linear system, and accurately quantified the nonlinear system and following low-pass filter. Adding the nonlinear and linear coherence function indicated a complete description of the system. Cerebral blood flow velocity and arterial pressure were measured in six data sets. Application of the linear and nonlinear systems identification techniques to the data showed a high-pass filter, like the linear transfer function, but the gain was smaller. The phase was similar between the two techniques. The linear coherence was low for frequencies below 0.1 Hz but improved by including a nonlinear term. The linear + nonlinear coherence was approximately 0.9 across the frequency bandwidth, indicating an improved description over the linear system analysis of the cerebral autoregulation system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.