ReviewJournal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs2020
Impella RP in hemodynamically unstable patients with acute pulmonary embolism.
Review in Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Axial Flow Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices: Physiology, Procedural Considerations, and Clinical Applications-A State-of-the-Art Review.Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2026Review
- Use of LVAD HeartMate 3 and Impella RP in the management of advanced heart failure in an elderly patient: a case report.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026Article
- Intraprocedural Management of Pulmonary Embolism Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Treatment, and Ventilatory and Cardiac Support.Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2026Review
- Optimal hemodynamic parameters for risk stratification in acute pulmonary embolism patients.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2024Review
- Introducing a Novel Innovative Technique for the Recording and Interpretation of Dynamic Coronary Angiography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support in Acute Heart Failure Complicated with Cardiogenic Shock.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Mechanical Support in High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: Review Article.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Cutting-Edge Techniques and Drugs for the Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Mechanical Circulatory Support and Critical Care Management of High-Risk Acute Pulmonary Embolism.Interventional cardiology clinics · 2023Review
- Percutaneous Management of High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism.Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions · 2023Review
- Peripartum Cardiogenic Shock and Mechanical Circulatory Support.Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2023Review
- Hemodynamic and respiratory support in pulmonary embolism: a narrative review.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
- Impella RP for Patients with Acute Right Ventricular Failure and Cardiogenic Shock: A Subanalysis from the IMP-IT Registry.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the last years, different case reports/studies have demonstrated that in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and refractory shock mechanical circulatory support (MCS) with Impella RP
Indexed as
Identifiers
31873827What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.