Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31873826›Full record

ArticleGenetica2020

Genome-wide profiles indicate wolf population connectivity within the eastern Carpathian Mountains.

H S Ericson, A Fedorca, I Toderas, Z Hegyeli, K Plis, I Dykyy, B Jędrzejewska, G Ionescu, M Fedorca, L Iacolina and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

H S EricsonDepartment of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
A FedorcaNational Institute for Research and Development in Forestry "Marin Dracea", Brasov, Romania.
I ToderasInstitute of Zoology, Moldova Academy of Sciences, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova.
Z Hegyeli"Milvus Group" Bird and Nature Protection Association, Târgu Mureș, Romania.
K PlisMammal Research Institute Polish Academy of Sciences, Białowieża, Poland.
I DykyyDepartment of Zoology, Biological Faculty, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Lviv, Ukraine.
B JędrzejewskaMammal Research Institute Polish Academy of Sciences, Białowieża, Poland.
G IonescuNational Institute for Research and Development in Forestry "Marin Dracea", Brasov, Romania.
M FedorcaNational Institute for Research and Development in Forestry "Marin Dracea", Brasov, Romania.
L IacolinaDepartment of Fisheries, Apiculture, Wildlife Management and Special Zoology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska cesta 25, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5504-6549
A V StronenDepartment of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. astrid.stronen@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5169-6736

Funding

Aalborg Zoo Conservation Foundation 2017-6Danish Natural Science Research Council 1337-00007National Authority for Scientific Research and Innovation PN1330206/PN16330207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Carpathian Mountains provide critical wildlife habitat in central Europe, and previous genome-wide studies have found western Carpathian Mountain wolves (Canis lupus) to be a separate population. Whereas differentiation to the north may be explained by a lowland-mountain transition and habitat fragmentation, the eastern Carpathian Mountains extending through Romania appear to offer continuous wildlife habitat southward. Our objective was to assess gene flow patterns and population connectivity among wolves in Romania, western Ukraine, and the Republic of Moldova. We sought to determine if the Carpathian Mountain region is best described by a north-south gradient in genetic profiles, or whether Romanian wolves show population structure with northern individuals clustering with western Ukraine. We genotyped 48 individuals with 170 000 single nucleotide polymorphism markers, and successful profiles from Romania (n = 27) and Moldova (n = 2) were merged with existing data from western Ukraine (n = 10). Expected heterozygosity was 0.234 (SE 0.001) for Romania and 0.229 (SE 0.001) for western Ukraine, whereas observed heterozygosity values were 0.230 (SE 0.001) versus 0.231 (SE 0.001). Population structure analyses with a maximum likelihood method supported K = 1 population, followed by K = 2 where Romania formed one cluster, and western Ukraine and Moldova formed another. Principal component analysis results were broadly consistent with K = 2. Pairwise F

Indexed as

AnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemEuropeGene FlowGenetic ProfileGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationGenome-Wide Association StudyPhylogeographyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideWolvesCanis lupusGene flowLarge carnivoresPopulation structureSingle nucleotide polymorphismTransboundary conservation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.