Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31873819›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutical research2019

Intraperitoneal Route of Drug Administration: Should it Be Used in Experimental Animal Studies?

Abdullah Al Shoyaib, Sabrina Rahman Archie, Vardan T Karamyan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06632184 (Pilot Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Multimodal Management With Peritoneal Lavage Using Saline Solution Versus Saline Solution With Ondansetron in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 324 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
324citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
33.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06632184 phase4active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Multimodal Management With Peritoneal Lavage Using Saline Solution Versus Saline Solution With Ondansetron in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto Mexicano del Seguro SocialRan2025 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsPostoperative Pain Management, Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Ondansetron, Postoperative Nausea and VomitingArmsOndansetron Intraperitoneal Lavage, Saline Intraperitoneal Lavage
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

324 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 572 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Systematic Review of the Potential ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Chelation treatment in a novel sub-toxic multi-metal model in rats.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Administration of an extrasynaptic δ-subunit GABAJournal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

264 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Abdullah Al ShoyaibDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, TTUHSC, Amarillo, Texas, USA.
Sabrina Rahman ArchieDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Vardan T KaramyanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, TTUHSC, Amarillo, Texas, USA. vardan.karamyan@ttuhsc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0050-6047
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center · USUniversity of Dhaka · BD

Funding

Development and Characterization of Small Molecule Activators of Peptidase Neurolysin for Stroke TherapyR01NS106879 · NINDS · TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIS CENTER · PI Thomas J Abbruscato, Vardan T. Karamyan · 2018 to 2026
$4.2M
American Heart Association 14BGIA20380826NINDS NIH HHS 1R01NS106879NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS106879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraperitoneal (IP) route of drug administration in laboratory animals is a common practice in many in vivo studies of disease models. While this route is an easy to master, quick, suitable for chronic treatments and with low impact of stress on laboratory rodents, there is a common concern that it may not be an acceptable route for drug administration in experimental studies. The latter is likely due to sparsity of information regarding pharmacokinetics of pharmacological agents and the mechanisms through which agents get systemic exposure after IP administration. In this review, we summarize the main mechanisms involved in bioavailability of IP administered drugs and provide examples of pharmacokinetic profiles for small and large molecules in comparison to other routes of administration. We conclude with a notion that IP administration of drugs in experimental studies involving rodents is a justifiable route for pharmacological and proof-of-concept studies where the goal is to evaluate the effect(s) of target engagement rather than properties of a drug formulation and/or its pharmacokinetics for clinical translation.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological AvailabilityDrug Administration RoutesDrug CompoundingHumansInjections, IntraperitonealInjections, SubcutaneousModels, AnimalParticle SizePharmaceutical PreparationsPharmacokineticsSignal TransductionPharmaceutical Preparationsbiopharmaceuticalintraperitonealmacromoleculepharmacokineticssmall molecule

Identifiers

PMID31873819
PMCPMC7412579
OpenAlexW2997805831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.