ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2020
Annual rate of newly treated atrial fibrillation by age and gender in France, 2010-2016.
Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anticoagulant Therapy in Elderly Hospitalized Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Critical Appraisal of Data from the Italian REPOSI Registry.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Nationwide Initiation of Cardiovascular Risk Treatments During the COVID-19 Pandemic in France: Women on a Slippery Slope?Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Objectives, design and main findings until 2020 from the Rotterdam Study.European journal of epidemiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Few studies are available on atrial fibrillation (AF) burden at a whole country scale. The objective was to estimate the rate of AF patients newly treated with oral anticoagulants (OAC) in France each year between 2010 and 2016 and to describe age and gender differences. We used the French national health data system. For each year between 2010 and 2016, we identified patients aged over 20 initiating OAC. OAC indicated for the treatment of AF was determined by hospitalization diagnoses, specific procedures and registered long-term disease status, or a multiple imputation process for patients with no recorded information as to why they initiated OAC. Among the 421,453 individuals initiating OAC treatment in 2016, the estimated number of newly treated AF patients was 210,131, women accounting for 46%, patients under 65 years old 17%, and 21.4% of patients living in most deprived area. Age-standardized rates reached 400/100,000 inhabitants. Approximately 19% of patients were recently hospitalized for heart failure and 7% for stroke. Age-standardized rates increased by 35% over the study period in both genders, with a marked increase in patients under 55 (+ 41%) and those over 85 years old (+ 60%). Annual rates of AF patients newly treated with OAC increased by 35% between 2010 and 2016. Important differences in rates were observed according to age, gender and the deprivation level of the living area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31873812What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.