Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31873298›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2020

Identifying cross-disease components of genetic risk across hospital data in the UK Biobank.

Adrian Cortes, Patrick K Albers, Calliope A Dendrou, Lars Fugger, Gil McVean

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Context-specific genetic effects inform endotypes and treatment in asthma.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Mendelian randomization and pleiotropy analysis.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adrian Cortes *Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3490-007X
Patrick K Albers *Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Calliope A DendrouWellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Lars FuggerOxford Centre for Neuroinflammation, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Clinical Neurology, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2883-3226
Gil McVeanBig Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. gil.mcvean@bdi.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5012-4162

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_12028Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853Medical Research Council MC_UU_00008/3Medical Research Council MC_UU_12010/3Wellcome Trust 090532Wellcome Trust 100308Wellcome Trust 100956Wellcome Trust 204290Wellcome Trust 204290/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic risk factors frequently affect multiple common human diseases, providing insight into shared pathophysiological pathways and opportunities for therapeutic development. However, systematic identification of genetic profiles of disease risk is limited by the availability of both comprehensive clinical data on population-scale cohorts and the lack of suitable statistical methodology that can handle the scale of and differential power inherent in multi-phenotype data. Here, we develop a disease-agnostic approach to cluster the genetic risk profiles for 3,025 genome-wide independent loci across 19,155 disease classification codes from 320,644 participants in the UK Biobank, representing a large and heterogeneous population. We identify 339 distinct disease association profiles and use multiple approaches to link clusters to the underlying biological pathways. We show how clusters can decompose the variance and covariance in risk for disease, thereby identifying underlying biological processes and their impact. We demonstrate the use of clusters in defining disease relationships and their potential in informing therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksGenetic LociGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait, HeritableAdultAgedFemaleGene-Environment InteractionGenetic Diseases, InbornHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhenotypeProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID31873298
PMCPMC6974401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.