Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31873169›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Interspecific competition among aphid parasitoids: molecular approaches reveal preferential exploitation of parasitized hosts.

Sebastián Ortiz-Martínez, Jean-Sébastien Pierre, Joan van Baaren, Cécile Le Lann, Francisca Zepeda-Paulo, Blas Lavandero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sebastián Ortiz-MartínezUniversidad de Talca, Instituto de Ciencias Biológicas, Laboratorio de Control Biológico, Avda. Lircay s/n, Talca, Chile.
Jean-Sébastien PierreUniversité Rennes (Univ Rennes), UMR-CNRS 6553, ECOBIO, F-35042, Rennes, France.
Joan van BaarenUniversité Rennes (Univ Rennes), UMR-CNRS 6553, ECOBIO, F-35042, Rennes, France.
Cécile Le LannUniversité Rennes (Univ Rennes), UMR-CNRS 6553, ECOBIO, F-35042, Rennes, France.
Francisca Zepeda-PauloUniversidad de Talca, Instituto de Ciencias Biológicas, Laboratorio de Control Biológico, Avda. Lircay s/n, Talca, Chile.
Blas LavanderoUniversidad de Talca, Instituto de Ciencias Biológicas, Laboratorio de Control Biológico, Avda. Lircay s/n, Talca, Chile. blavandero@utalca.cl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When a guild of species exploit the same limited resources, interspecific competition induces the exclusion of inferior competitors, in which case, interspecific recognition mechanisms are needed. Here, we address resource partitioning and interspecific competition among three main solitary parasitoid species attacking the same host resource, the aphid Sitobion avenae in wheat fields. Optimal host acceptance models predict that parasitoid species should prefer attacking unparasitized hosts when they are available in order to maximize their fitness, as already parasitized hosts are less valuable for laying eggs, especially for inferior competitors. Therefore, we expected the level of competition (multiparasitism) in the field to increase at low host density. By using a combination of taxonomical (determination) and molecular (PCR-based) approaches, we assessed the species of all parasitoid adults and immature stages within aphid hosts. Our results demonstrate that, early in the season, the multiparasitism rates were low, whereas they were high in the mid-late season, corresponding to an aphid density decrease over time. Moreover, parasitoid species could not have been exploiting host resources randomly and the better competitor, Aphidius ervi, seemed to be foraging preferentially on hosts already parasitized by the inferior competitor A. rhopalosiphi, even when unparasitized hosts were still available. This could be due to differences in their host detection capability, as species with a narrow host range may be better at detecting their hosts in comparison with species with a greater host range, such as A. ervi, with a greater host range within the guild. Our study suggests differences in the host exploitation of two prevalent parasitoid species through the main period of aphid colonization, which still allowed the coexistence of a third inferior competitor (A. rhopalosiphi) within the assemblage, in spite of some negative interactions (multiparasitism) and redundancies.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsAphidsFemaleHost-Parasite InteractionsMaleOvipositionTriticum

Identifiers

PMID31873169
PMCPMC6928038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.