Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31873165›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Probabilistic Assessment of Nerve Regeneration with Diffusion MRI in Rat Models of Peripheral Nerve Trauma.

Isaac V Manzanera Esteve, Angel F Farinas, Alonda C Pollins, Marlieke E Nussenbaum, Nancy L Cardwell, Hakmook Kang, Mark D Does, Wesley P Thayer, Richard D Dortch

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. High-Field Diffusion Tensor Imaging of Median, Tibial, and Sural Nerves in Type 2 Diabetes With Morphometric Analysis.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Isaac V Manzanera EsteveVanderbilt University Medical Center, Department Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Nashville, TN, USA.
Angel F FarinasVanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Plastic Surgery, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9456-1444
Alonda C PollinsVanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Plastic Surgery, Nashville, TN, USA.
Marlieke E NussenbaumVanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Plastic Surgery, Nashville, TN, USA.
Nancy L CardwellVanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Plastic Surgery, Nashville, TN, USA.
Hakmook KangVanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Biostatistics, Nashville, TN, USA.
Mark D DoesVanderbilt University Medical Center, Department Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Nashville, TN, USA.
Wesley P ThayerVanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Plastic Surgery, Nashville, TN, USA.
Richard D DortchVanderbilt University Medical Center, Department Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Nashville, TN, USA. richard.dortch@vanderbilt.edu.

Funding

Postdoctoral Training in Biomedical MRI and MRST32EB001628 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI John C Gore · 2003 to 2026
$7.0M
Quantitative Assessment of Peripheral Nerve Injury and Repair via Multi-Parametric MRIR01NS097821 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DORTCH, RICHARD · 2016 to 2020
$1.7M
Upgrade of a 7T Small Animal MRI/MRS SystemS10OD019993 · OD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI GORE, JOHN C · 2015 to 2015
$600k
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB001628NIH HHS S10 OD019993NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS097821
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nerve regeneration after injury must occur in a timely fashion to restore function. Unfortunately, current methods (e.g., electrophysiology) provide limited information following trauma, resulting in delayed management and suboptimal outcomes. Herein, we evaluated the ability of diffusion MRI to monitor nerve regeneration after injury/repair. Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into three treatment groups (sham = 21, crush = 23, cut/repair = 19) and ex vivo diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) was performed 1-12 weeks post-surgery. Behavioral data showed a distinction between crush and cut/repair nerves at 4 weeks. This was consistent with DTI, which found that thresholds based on the ratio of radial and axial diffusivities (RD/AD = 0.40 ± 0.02) and fractional anisotropy (FA = 0.53 ± 0.01) differentiated crush from cut/repair injuries. By the 12

Indexed as

AnimalsDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingDiffusion Tensor ImagingDisease Models, AnimalModels, NeurologicalModels, StatisticalNerve RegenerationPeripheral Nerve InjuriesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRecovery of FunctionTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID31873165
PMCPMC6928159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.