ArticleScientific reports2019
Predictive factors for inadequate bowel preparation using low-volume polyethylene glycol (PEG) plus ascorbic acid for an outpatient colonoscopy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Split dose bowel preparation before colonoscopy of PEG (Nulytely) in comparison to routine single dose bowel preparation.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology AssociationTrial
- Safety and Feasibility of a Patient-Centered Same-Day Polypectomy Referral System: A Single-Center Experience.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Prospective, Observational Study of the Efficacy, and Tolerability of a Same-Day, Low-Volume D-Sorbitol, Ascorbic Acid, and Sodium Picosulfate Regimen for Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Observational
- Applying machine learning to predict bowel preparation adequacy in elderly patients for colonoscopy: development and validation of a web-based prediction tool.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of a Mobile Health Application for Educating Outpatients about Bowel Preparation.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Bowel-cleansing efficacy of the 1L polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation NER1006 (PLENVU) in patient subgroups in two phase III trials.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low-volume polyethylene glycol (PEG) plus ascorbic acid solutions are widely used for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy. This study aimed to investigate the pre-endoscopic predictive factors for inadequate preparation in subjects receiving low-volume PEG plus ascorbic acid. A prospective study was performed at Gangnam Severance Hospital, Korea, from June 2016 to December 2016. All participants received low-volume PEG plus ascorbic acid solutions for outpatient colonoscopy. The split-dose bowel preparation was administered in subject with morning colonoscopy while same day bowel preparation was used for afternoon colonoscopy. 715 patients were enrolled (mean age 56.1 years, 54.4% male), of which 138 (19.3%) had an inadequate bowel preparation. In multivariable analysis, cirrhosis (OR 4.943, 95% CI 1.191-20.515), low (less than 70%) compliance for three-day low-residual diet (OR 2.165, 95% CI 1.333-3.515), brown liquid rectal effluent (compared with clear or semi-clear effluent) (OR 7.604, 95% CI, 1.760-32.857), and longer time interval (≥2 hours) between last defecation and colonoscopic examination (OR 1.841, 95% CI, 1.190-2.849) were found as an independent predictors for inadequate preparation. These predictive factors may be useful in guiding additional intervention to improve quality of bowel preparation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.