Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31873129›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Comparison between single and multi-locus approaches for specimen identification in Mytilus mussels.

María Angélica Larraín, Pía González, Claudio Pérez, Cristián Araneda

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

María Angélica LarraínFood Quality Research Center, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile. mlarrain@uchile.cl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6433-194X
Pía GonzálezFood Quality Research Center, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Claudio PérezLaboratorio de Genética y Biotecnología en Acuicultura, Departamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Agronómicas, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9688-184X
Cristián AranedaFood Quality Research Center, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9986-5340
University of Chile · CLUniversity Ucinf · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mytilus mussels have been the object of much research given their sentinel role in coastal ecosystems and significant value as an aquaculture resource appreciated for both, its flavour and nutritional content. Some of the most-studied Mytilus species are M. edulis, M. galloprovincialis, M. chilensis and M. trossulus. As species identification based on morphological characteristics of Mytilus specimens is difficult, molecular markers are often used. Single-locus markers can give conflicting results when used independently; not all markers differentiate among all species, and the markers target genomic regions with different evolutionary histories. We evaluated the concordance between the PCR-RFLP markers most commonly-used for species identification in mussels within the Mytilus genus (Me15-16, ITS, mac-1, 16S rRNA and COI) when used alone (mono-locus approach) or together (multi-locus approach). In this study, multi-locus strategy outperformed the mono-locus methods, clearly identifying all four species and also showed similar specimen identification performance than a 49 SNPs panel. We hope that these findings will contribute to a better understanding of DNA marker-based analysis of Mytilus taxa. These results support the use of a multi-locus approach when studying this important marine resource, including research on food quality and safety, sustainable production and conservation.

Indexed as

Genetic LociAnimalsCell NucleusElectron Transport Complex IVGenetic MarkersGeographyMitochondriaMytilusPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthPrincipal Component AnalysisProtein SubunitsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSpecies SpecificityElectron Transport Complex IVGenetic MarkersProtein SubunitsRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID31873129
PMCPMC6928075
OpenAlexW2996452764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.