Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31873087›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Robust latent-variable interpretation of in vivo regression models by nested resampling.

Alexander W Caulk, Kevin A Janes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander W CaulkDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
Kevin A JanesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA. kjanes@virginia.edu.
University of Virginia · USYale University · US

Funding

Mechanisms Underlying The Progression of Large Artery Stiffness in HypertensionR01HL105297 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI FIGUEROA, CARLOS ALBERTO, HUMPHREY, JAY D. · 2010 to 2019
$3.0M
An Integrated Systems Approach for Incompletely Penetrant Onco-phenotypes.U01CA215794 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI JANES, KEVIN A · 2017 to 2021
$2.4M
Interdisciplinary Training in Systems & Biomolecular Data ScienceT32GM145443 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI Kevin A Janes, Jason Papin · 2022 to 2026
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA215794NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL105297NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM145443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simple multilinear methods, such as partial least squares regression (PLSR), are effective at interrelating dynamic, multivariate datasets of cell-molecular biology through high-dimensional arrays. However, data collected in vivo are more difficult, because animal-to-animal variability is often high, and each time-point measured is usually a terminal endpoint for that animal. Observations are further complicated by the nesting of cells within tissues or tissue sections, which themselves are nested within animals. Here, we introduce principled resampling strategies that preserve the tissue-animal hierarchy of individual replicates and compute the uncertainty of multidimensional decompositions applied to global averages. Using molecular-phenotypic data from the mouse aorta and colon, we find that interpretation of decomposed latent variables (LVs) changes when PLSR models are resampled. Lagging LVs, which statistically improve global-average models, are unstable in resampled iterations that preserve nesting relationships, arguing that these LVs should not be mined for biological insight. Interestingly, resampling is less discriminatory for multidimensional regressions of in vitro data, where replicate-to-replicate variance is sufficiently low. Our work illustrates the challenges and opportunities in translating systems-biology approaches from cultured cells to living organisms. Nested resampling adds a straightforward quality-control step for interpreting the robustness of in vivo regression models.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalRegression AnalysisAnimalsAortaBiomechanical PhenomenaBiostatisticsColonComputational BiologyHypertensionLeast-Squares AnalysisMaleMiceMice, Knockout, ApoEModels, BiologicalNonlinear DynamicsVascular Remodeling

Identifiers

PMID31873087
PMCPMC6928252
OpenAlexW2995367970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.