Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31872886›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2020

Is high sensitivity always desirable for a grating-based differential phase contrast imaging system?

Xu Ji, Ran Zhang, Ke Li, Guang-Hong Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xu JiDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Ran ZhangDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Ke LiDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Guang-Hong ChenDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.

Funding

Biology of Breast Cancers Arising in Older WomenR01AG020521 · NIA · BUCK INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON AGING · PI BENZ, CHRISTOPHER · 2003 to 2007
$2.8M
Multi-Contrast X-ray Breast ImagingR01EB020521 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CHEN, GUANG-HONG, LI, KE · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
Breast Cancer Research Program W81XWH-16-1-0031National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering of the National Institutes of Health R01EB020521NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020521
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn grating-based x-ray differential phase contrast (DPC) imaging, the measured signal amplitude of the phase shift induced by an image object is proportional to the so-called system sensitivity. Therefore, to achieve a better signal-to-noise (SNR) for improved imaging performance, it is generally believed that one should increase the system sensitivity by reducing the period of the analyzer grating or increasing the distance between the phase grating and analyzer grating. The purpose of this work is to theoretically and experimentally demonstrate that there is an optimal system sensitivity to attain the highest SNR for a given task provided that the standard phase-stepping acquisition and phase retrieval methods are used. When system sensitivity goes beyond this optimal value, SNR decreases and the imaging performance deteriorates.

methodsDue to the fundamental fact that the measured phase signal is a cyclic variable, the phase wrapping effect is inevitable in DPC imaging when the system sensitivity increases. The phase wrapping effect appears in both signal and noise measurements. The effect in the signal measurement is manifested in the so-called signal statistical bias and such effect often impacts the accuracy of the measurement. The phase wrapping effect also appears in the noise variance measurement and impacts the precision of the measurement. A thorough theoretical analysis was performed in this work to demonstrate the quantitative impacts of phase wrapping on both signal bias and noise variance and thus on the actual system SNR. The joint effect of phase wrapping in both the signal bias and noise variance yields an optimal system sensitivity to achieve the highest SNR. Both extensive numerical simulation studies and experimental studies were performed to validate the theoretical analysis.

resultsBoth theoretical analysis and experimental studies show that the SNR of the DPC signal is not always proportional to the sensitivity due to the cyclic nature of the signal and the phase wrapping effect. For a given refraction angle and exposure level, there exists an optimal sensitivity factor that maximizes the SNR, beyond which, increasing the sensitivity will decrease the SNR.

conclusionsIncrease of system sensitivity does not always improve x-ray DPC imaging performance provided that the standard phase-stepping acquisition and phase retrieval methods are used.

Indexed as

RadiographySignal-To-Noise RatioModels, TheoreticalPhantoms, Imaginggrating interferometerphase contrast imagingphase wrappingSNR

Identifiers

PMID31872886
PMCPMC7962903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.