Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31872580›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2019

Comparative analysis of single- and dual-wavelength photodynamic therapy regimes with chlorin-based photosensitizers: animal study.

Daria Kurakina, Aleksandr Khilov, Maria Shakhova, Natalia Orlinskaya, Ekaterina Sergeeva, Alina Meller, Ilya Turchin, Mikhail Kirillin

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The effect of fluence rate and wavelength on the formation of protoporphyrin IX photoproducts.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daria KurakinaInstitute of Applied Physics RAS, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.
Aleksandr KhilovInstitute of Applied Physics RAS, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.
Maria ShakhovaInstitute of Applied Physics RAS, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.
Natalia OrlinskayaInstitute of Applied Physics RAS, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.
Ekaterina SergeevaInstitute of Applied Physics RAS, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.
Alina MellerInstitute of Applied Physics RAS, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.
Ilya TurchinInstitute of Applied Physics RAS, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.
Mikhail KirillinInstitute of Applied Physics RAS, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.
Institute of Applied Physics · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two pronounced absorption peaks in blue and red ranges of the chlorin-based photosensitizer (PS) absorption spectrum provide additional benefits in photodynamic therapy (PDT) performance. Differing optical properties of biological tissues in these ranges allow for both dual-wavelength diagnostics and PDT performance. We provide a comparative analysis of different PDT regimes performed with blue and red lights and their combination, with doses varying from 50 to 150  J  /  cm

Indexed as

AnimalsBody TemperatureChlorophyllidesFemaleOptical ImagingPhotobleachingPhotochemotherapyPhotosensitizing AgentsPorphyrinsRabbitsSkinTomography, Optical CoherenceChlorophyllidesPhotosensitizing AgentsphytochlorinPorphyrinschlorin-based photosensitizersfluorescence imagingoptical coherence tomographyphotodynamic therapy

Identifiers

PMID31872580
PMCPMC7013345
OpenAlexW2998065348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.