Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31872514›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2020

Combining the use of a fetal fraction-based risk algorithm and probability of an informative redraw in noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy.

Peter Benn, Kimberly Martin, Trudy McKanna, Elizabeth Valenti, Paul Billings, Zachary Demko

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. High-throughput fetal fraction amplification increases analytical performance of noninvasive prenatal screening.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peter BennUConn Health, Farmington, CT, USA.
Kimberly MartinNatera, Inc., San Carlos, CA, USA.
Trudy McKannaNatera, Inc., San Carlos, CA, USA.
Elizabeth ValentiNatera, Inc., San Carlos, CA, USA.
Paul BillingsNatera, Inc., San Carlos, CA, USA.
Zachary DemkoNatera, Inc., San Carlos, CA, USA.
Natera (United States) · USUConn Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some women undergoing noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) do not receive an informative result due to low fetal fraction (FF). A proportion of these are at increased risk for fetal trisomy 13, 18, or triploidy, while others have no change from their prior risk. Women with an initial uninformative NIPT need to be counseled about any such change in their risk for fetal abnormality and also the probability that a redraw will be informative. To help in the decision making, we reviewed a dataset of single nucleotide polymorphism-based NIPT with uninformative results where a redraw was received. Risk for trisomy 13, 18, or triploidy was evaluated using a fetal fraction-based risk (FFBR) algorithm. Risk-unchanged women were further analyzed using a regression model to determine the likelihood of an informative redraw. Of 2,644 women with an uninformative NIPT and a redraw, 1,147 (43.4%) were high risk for trisomy 13, 18, or triploidy. 1,497 (56.6%) were risk unchanged and, of these, 975 (65.1%) cases had an informative redraw (i.e., risks were available for 2,122 (80%) of those initially classified as uninformative). The regression model for the risk-unchanged cases provided a new table for predicting an informative redraw. Likelihood of a successful redraw was significantly (p < .001) dependent on the initial FF, maternal weight, and time between blood draws. We conclude that the FFBR algorithm and the predictive model for an informative redraw provide complementary additions in the management of women presented with an initially uninformative SNP-based NIPT due to low FF. We suggest approaches for the counseling and follow-up testing for women with an initially uninformative NIPT.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAneuploidyAdultFemaleHumansNoninvasive Prenatal TestingPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePregnancyProbabilityTrisomycell-free DNAfetal fractiongenetic counselinggenetic testingnoninvasive prenatal testingprenatal diagnosisprenatal screeningtrisomy

Identifiers

PMID31872514
PMCPMC7586960
OpenAlexW2997803788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.