Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31872429›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of surgery2020

Bowel preparation under siege.

J C Alverdy, N Hyman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Preparing the Bowel for Surgery in the Era of Microbiome Sciences.The Surgical clinics of North America · 2025
    Review
  4. Management of giant inguinal hernia; report of four cases and review of literature.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Surgical infections · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Anastomotic Leak: Toward an Understanding of Its Root Causes.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. The Biology of Anastomotic Healing-the Unknown Overwhelms the Known.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J C AlverdyUniversity of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, 5841 S Maryland Avenue, MC 6090, Chicago, Illinois, 60637, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1854-4551
N HymanUniversity of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, 5841 S Maryland Avenue, MC 6090, Chicago, Illinois, 60637, USA.

Funding

US National Institutes of Health 5R01GMO62344-19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An analysis of the results and conclusions from the most recent RCTs of the role of mechanical bowel preparation before colonic surgery is presented. The results indicate a wide disparity in the methods, results and conclusion of these studies, and the lack of microbial culture confirmation to advance understanding of how to move the field forward. Controversy on bowel preparation in colorectal surgery.

Indexed as

Digestive System Surgical ProceduresColonColorectal SurgeryElective Surgical ProceduresHumansPreoperative Care

Identifiers

PMID31872429
PMCPMC7938815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.