Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31872391›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2020

Molecular typing of Campylobacter jejuni strains: comparison among four different techniques.

Miliane Rodrigues Frazão, Roberto Antonio de Souza, Marta Inês Cazentini Medeiros, Sheila da Silva Duque, Guojie Cao, Marc William Allard, Juliana Pfrimer Falcão

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. SVR-flaA typing of erythromycin- and ciprofloxacin-resistant Campylobacter jejuni strains isolated from poultry slaughterhouses in southern Brazil.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Miliane Rodrigues FrazãoDepartamento de Análises Clínicas, Toxicológicas e Bromatológicas, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, FCFRP-USP, Av. do Café, s/n°- Campus Universitário USP, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14040-903, Brazil.
Roberto Antonio de SouzaDepartamento de Análises Clínicas, Toxicológicas e Bromatológicas, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, FCFRP-USP, Av. do Café, s/n°- Campus Universitário USP, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14040-903, Brazil.
Marta Inês Cazentini MedeirosInstituto Adolfo Lutz de Ribeirão Preto, Rua Minas, 877, Campos Elíseos, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14085-410, Brazil.
Sheila da Silva DuqueFundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil, 4365, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21040-900, Brazil.
Guojie CaoDivision of Microbiology, Office of Regular Science, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus Drive, College Park, MD, 20740, USA.
Marc William AllardDivision of Microbiology, Office of Regular Science, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus Drive, College Park, MD, 20740, USA.
Juliana Pfrimer FalcãoDepartamento de Análises Clínicas, Toxicológicas e Bromatológicas, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, FCFRP-USP, Av. do Café, s/n°- Campus Universitário USP, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14040-903, Brazil. jufalcao@fcfrp.usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1459-9355
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition · USUniversidade de São Paulo · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRInstituto Adolfo Lutz · BRUniversidade de Ribeirão Preto · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 141495/2016-2Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 303475/2015-3Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 304399/2018-3Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2014/13029-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compared the ability of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), flaA small variable region (SVR) sequencing, analysis of the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats locus by high resolution melting analysis (CRISPR-HRMA), and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) for typing 111 Campylobacter jejuni strains isolated from diverse sources during 20 years in Brazil. For this, we used previous results obtained by PFGE and flaA-SVR sequencing from our research group and performed CRISPR-HRMA and MLST typing for the first time. Furthermore, the discrimination index (DI) of each method was accessed. The DI for PFGE, flaA-SVR sequencing, CRISPR-HRMA, and MLST was 0.980, 0.932, 0.868, and 0.931, respectively. By PFGE and flaA-SVR sequencing, some strains from clinical and non-clinical sources and from humans and animals presented ≥ 80% similarity. Similarly, some strains from different origins presented the same ST and CRISPR-HRMA types. In conclusion, despite the different DI values, all assays provided the same epidemiological information suggesting that a potential transmission may have occurred between C. jejuni from clinical and non-clinical sources and from animals and humans in Brazil. Furthermore it was demonstrated the suitability of PFGE that should be used preferably together with MLST and/or flaA-SVR sequencing for typing C. jejuni strains.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial Typing TechniquesCampylobacter InfectionsCampylobacter jejuniChickensDNA, BacterialElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldGenotypeHaplorhiniHumansMultilocus Sequence TypingSewageDNA, BacterialSewageCampylobacter jejuniCRISPR-HRMAflaA-SVR sequencingMLSTMolecular epidemiologyPulsed field gel electrophoresis

Identifiers

PMID31872391
PMCPMC7203312
OpenAlexW2996420838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.