Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31872386›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2020

Impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations on ovarian reserve and fertility preservation outcomes in young women with breast cancer.

Eleonora Porcu, Giulia Maria Cillo, Linda Cipriani, Federica Sacilotto, Leonardo Notarangelo, Giuseppe Damiano, Maria Dirodi, Ilaria Roncarati

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Reproductive genetics and health.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Fertility and Pregnancy-Related Issues in YoungBreast cancer : basic and clinical research · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eleonora PorcuInfertility and IVF Unit, University of Bologna, Sant'Orsola - Malpighi University Hospital, Via Massarenti 13, 40138 University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. eleonora.porcu@unibo.it.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5892-480X
Giulia Maria CilloInfertility and IVF Unit, University of Bologna, Sant'Orsola - Malpighi University Hospital, Via Massarenti 13, 40138 University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Linda CiprianiInfertility and IVF Unit, University of Bologna, Sant'Orsola - Malpighi University Hospital, Via Massarenti 13, 40138 University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Federica SacilottoInfertility and IVF Unit, University of Bologna, Sant'Orsola - Malpighi University Hospital, Via Massarenti 13, 40138 University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Leonardo NotarangeloInfertility and IVF Unit, University of Bologna, Sant'Orsola - Malpighi University Hospital, Via Massarenti 13, 40138 University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giuseppe DamianoInfertility and IVF Unit, University of Bologna, Sant'Orsola - Malpighi University Hospital, Via Massarenti 13, 40138 University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Maria DirodiInfertility and IVF Unit, University of Bologna, Sant'Orsola - Malpighi University Hospital, Via Massarenti 13, 40138 University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Ilaria RoncaratiInfertility and IVF Unit, University of Bologna, Sant'Orsola - Malpighi University Hospital, Via Massarenti 13, 40138 University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
IRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations on ovarian reserve and fertility preservation outcome. The main purpose and research question of the study is to determine the impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations on ovarian reserve and fertility preservation outcomes.

methodsProspective study: 67 breast cancer patients between 18 and 40 years old, undergoing a fertility preservation by means of oocyte storage were considered. Inclusions criteria for the study were age between 18 and 40 years old, BMI between 18 and 28, breast cancer neoplasm stage I and II according to American Joint Committee on Cancer classification (2017) and no metastasis. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: age over 40 years old, BMI < 18 and > 28, breast cancer neoplasm stage III and IV and do not performed the BRCA test. A total of 21 patients had not performed the test and were excluded. Patients were divided into four groups: Group A was composed by 11 breast cancer patients with BRCA 1 mutations, Group B was composed by 11 breast cancer patients with BRCA 2 mutations, Group C was composed by 24 women with breast cancer without BRCA mutations, and Group D (control) was composed by 181 normal women.

resultsGroup A showed significant lower AMH levels compared to Group C and D (1.2 ± 1.1 vs 4.5 ± 4.1 p < 0.05 and 1.2 ± 1.1 vs 3.8 ± 2.5 p < 0.05). BRCA1 mutated patients showed a significant lower rate of mature oocytes (MII) compared to Group C (3.1 ± 2.3 vs 7.2 ± 4.4 p < 0,05) and Group D (3.1 ± 2.3 vs 7.3 ± 3.4; p < 0,05). Breast cancer patients needed a higher dose of gonadotropins compared to controls (Group A 2206 ± 1392 Group B2047.5 ± 829.9 Group C 2106 ± 1336 Group D 1597 ± 709 p < 0,05). No significant differences were found among the groups considering basal FSH levels, duration of stimulation, number of developed follicles, and number of total retrieved oocytes. Regarding BRCA2 mutation, no effect on fertility was shown in this study.

conclusionsThe study showed that BRCA1 patients had a higher risk of premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) confirmed by a diminished ovarian reserve and a lower number of mature oocytes suitable for cryopreservation.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsFemaleFertility PreservationHumansMutationOocyte RetrievalOocytesOvarian ReserveOvulation InductionPrimary Ovarian InsufficiencyYoung AdultBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanBRCABreast cancerFertility preservationOocyte cryopreservation

Identifiers

PMID31872386
PMCPMC7125060
OpenAlexW2994723653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.