Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31872328›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience bulletin2020

Test-Retest Reliability of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Activation for a Vergence Eye Movement Task.

Cristian Morales, Suril Gohel, Xiaobo Li, Mitchell Scheiman, Bharat B Biswal, Elio M Santos, Chang Yaramothu, Tara L Alvarez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience bulletin, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Neural Control of Vergence and Ocular Accommodation.Annual review of vision science · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Functional magnetic resonance imaging activation for different vergence eye movement subtypes.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cristian MoralesBiomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA.
Suril GohelDepartment of Health Informatics, Rutgers University School of Health Professions, Newark, NJ, 07107, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2387-5021
Xiaobo LiBiomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8153-5415
Mitchell ScheimanPennsylvania College of Optometry, Salus University, Philadelphia, PA, 19027, USA.
Bharat B BiswalBiomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA.
Elio M SantosBiomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA.
Chang YaramothuBiomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA.
Tara L AlvarezBiomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA. tara.l.alvarez@njit.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8797-1613

Funding

Functional Mechanisms of Neural Control in Convergence InsufficiencyR01EY023261 · NEI · NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ALVAREZ, TARA LYNN · 2014 to 2025
$4.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vergence eye movements are the inward and outward rotation of the eyes responsible for binocular coordination. While studies have mapped and investigated the neural substrates of vergence, it is not well understood whether vergence eye movements evoke the blood oxygen level-dependent signal reliably in separate experimental visits. The test-retest reliability of stimulus-induced vergence eye movement tasks during a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment is important for future randomized clinical trials (RCTs). In this study, we established region of interest (ROI) masks for the vergence neural circuit. Twenty-seven binocularly normal young adults participated in two functional imaging sessions measured on different days on the same 3T Siemens scanner. The fMRI experiments used a block design of sustained visual fixation and rest blocks interleaved between task blocks that stimulated eight or four vergence eye movements. The test-retest reliability of task-activation was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and that of spatial extent was assessed using the Dice coefficient. Functional activation during the vergence eye movement task of eight movements compared to rest was repeatable within the primary visual cortex (ICC = 0.8), parietal eye fields (ICC = 0.6), supplementary eye field (ICC = 0.5), frontal eye fields (ICC = 0.5), and oculomotor vermis (ICC = 0.6). The results demonstrate significant test-retest reliability in the ROIs of the vergence neural substrates for functional activation magnitude and spatial extent using the stimulus protocol of a task block stimulating eight vergence eye movements compared to sustained fixation. These ROIs can be used in future longitudinal RCTs to study patient populations with vergence dysfunctions.

Indexed as

AdultBrainEye MovementsFemaleFixation, OcularFrontal LobeHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleReproducibility of ResultsVisual CortexFunctional MRITest–retest reliabilityVergence eye movementVergence region of interest masks

Identifiers

PMID31872328
PMCPMC7186292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.