Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31872301›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2020

A meta-analysis of the safety and effectiveness of titanium mesh versus bone graft alone for the treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis.

Zhian He, Yufu Ou, Bo Hou, Jianxun Wei, Xiaoping Mu

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zhian HeDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Affiliated Chencun Hospital of Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, 528300, Guangdong, China.
Yufu OuDepartment of Orthopaedics, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, No. 6, Taoyuan Road, Qingxiu Distinct, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, China.
Bo HouDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Affiliated Chencun Hospital of Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, 528300, Guangdong, China.
Jianxun WeiDepartment of Orthopaedics, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, No. 6, Taoyuan Road, Qingxiu Distinct, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, China.
Xiaoping MuDepartment of Orthopaedics, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, No. 6, Taoyuan Road, Qingxiu Distinct, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, China. muxbin1991@hotmail.com.
The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region · CNSouthern Medical University · CNThe First People's Hospital of Shunde · CN

Funding

Chinese Government Scholarship 2018018180151Key Scientific Research Projects for Medicine and Health of Guangxi Emphasis 2010029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study is to investigate, using a meta-analysis, differences in safety and effectiveness between a titanium mesh bone graft and bone graft alone for the treatment of thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis.

methodsPubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang (Chinese) and other databases were searched up to April 2019 using predetermined terms. Published studies investigating the safety and effectiveness of a titanium mesh bone graft versus a bone graft alone for the treatment of thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis were included. Two authors independently extracted the data and evaluated the quality of the included articles. A meta-analysis of relevant outcome indicators was performed using Stata 14 and RevMan 5.3 software.

resultsWe retrieved 8 retrospective studies that met the inclusion criteria and enrolled a total of 401 patients, including 203 patients in the titanium mesh group and 198 in the bone graft only group. Each study was rated as high quality. The meta-analysis results showed no statistically significant differences between the 2 bone graft methods in terms of surgery-related indicators, clinical effectiveness, imaging and complications.

conclusionsBoth titanium mesh and bone grafts alone are effective for the treatment of thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis based on safety. However, the results of this study do not support the superiority of titanium mesh bone grafts reported in previous studies. Because of the high risk of bias of the conclusions of a meta-analysis of non-randomized studies and the small sample sizes for some of the most important outcomes, randomized controlled trials are expected to further examine the reliability of the present findings.

Indexed as

Bone TransplantationSurgical MeshTitaniumBiocompatible MaterialsHumansLumbar VertebraeProsthesis ImplantationReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesThoracic VertebraeTreatment OutcomeTuberculosis, SpinalBiocompatible MaterialsTitaniumBone graftMeta-analysisThoracolumbar tuberculosisTitanium mesh

Identifiers

PMID31872301
OpenAlexW2996487477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.