Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31872298›Full record

SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2020

Distress screening and supportive care referrals used by telephone-based health services: a systematic review.

Jo Taylor, Elizabeth A Fradgley, Tara Clinton-McHarg, Della Roach, Chris L Paul

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jo TaylorSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Level 4 West, HMRI Building, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia. jtaylor1@newcastle.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9258-1372
Elizabeth A FradgleySchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Level 4 West, HMRI Building, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3535-2885
Tara Clinton-McHargPriority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, Level 4 West, HMRI Building, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5833-7376
Della RoachSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Level 4 West, HMRI Building, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3987-3007
Chris L PaulSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Level 4 West, HMRI Building, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0504-5246

Funding

Hunter Cancer Research Alliance N/APriority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Australia N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePeople affected by chronic diseases such as cancer report high levels of distress and a need for psychosocial support. It is unclear whether telephone-based services for people affected by chronic disease are a practical setting for implementing distress screening, referral protocols and rescreening to direct supportive care where it is needed. This systematic review aimed to describe the published literature regarding distress screening and supportive care referral practices in telephone-based services for people affected by chronic diseases such as cancer.

methodsA systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Cochrane and Scopus was conducted in February 2018. Included quantitative studies involved: patients or caregivers affected by chronic diseases including cancer and describe a health service assessing psychosocial needs or distress via telephone. Extracted data included the type of cancer or other chronic disease, sample size, screening tool, referral or rescreening protocols, and type of health service.

resultsThe search identified 3989 potential articles with additional searches returning 30 studies (n = 4019); fourteen were eligible for full-text review. Of the 14 studies, 13 included cancer patients. Studies were across multiple settings and identified nine distress screening tools in use.

conclusionThe reviewed studies indicate that validated distress-screening tools are being used via telephone to identify distress, particularly in relation to cancer. Screening-driven supportive care referrals are also taking place in telephone-based services. However, not all services use an established referral protocol. Ongoing rescreening of callers' distress is also limited despite it being an important recommendation from psycho-oncology guidelines.

Indexed as

Psychosocial Support SystemsCaregiversChronic DiseaseHumansMaleMass ScreeningNeoplasmsReferral and ConsultationResearchTelephoneChronic diseaseDistress screeningSupportive careTelephone

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.