Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31872297›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2020

Patient-reported outcomes: using ESAS to screen for anemia.

Peter A S Johnstone, Raviteja Alla, Hsiang-Hsuan Michael Yu, Diane Portman, Hing Cheng, Ross Mitchell, Heather Jim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peter A S JohnstoneDepartment of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA. Peter.Johnstone@Moffitt.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4221-9388
Raviteja AllaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Hsiang-Hsuan Michael YuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Diane PortmanDepartment of Supportive Care, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Hing ChengPE Research Consulting Ltd, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Ross MitchellDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Heather JimDepartment of Health Outcomes & Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KENNETH Lynn WRIGHT · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatient perspectives of their symptom burden provide valuable data to clinicians. We have investigated the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) extensively in our radiation oncology and supportive care clinics. We were interested in examining whether ESAS data could correlate with anemia.

methodsOur clinics have used a modified ESAS since 2015; patients now input data directly into the electronic medical record using a tablet interface. Of 9813 patients providing ESAS reports, we retrieved hemoglobin (Hb) data from 8304. Of these, 1351 patients had both performed on the same day. Anemia existed if Hb was < 13.0 g/L (man) or < 12 g/L (woman).

resultsWhen self-reported scores for both tiredness and shortness of breath were 7 and above, the positive predictive value (PPV) for anemia was 80%, and specificity was 97.6%. Corresponding sensitivity was 8.2% and accuracy was 48.9%. This 2-item model could be a valuable screening tool for lack of anemia in cancer patients in the outpatient setting: if patients rate both these ESAS items < 7, there exists < 3% false positive risk. An expanded 5-item model adding lack of appetite, pain, and bone marrow primary site increased sensitivity and accuracy at the expense of specificity and PPV. We consider this less clinically functional than the two-item screen.

conclusionThis is one of the first reports of PRO data screening for a clinical sign, in this case, anemia. Predicting freedom from anemia is feasible using 2 ESAS survey questions: tiredness and shortness of breath.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnemiaFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedYoung AdultAnemiaESASPatient-reported outcomesSymptom management

Identifiers

PMID31872297
PMCPMC7771327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.