ArticleNucleic acids research2020
Accurate inference of the full base-pairing structure of RNA by deep mutational scanning and covariation-induced deviation of activity.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Strain-specific epistasis shapes fitness landscapes of APOBEC3G antagonism by HIV-1 Vif proteins.Science advances · 2026Article
- Fitness Landscapes of APOBEC3G Antagonism by HIV-1 Vif proteins.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Systematic analysis of cotranscriptional RNA folding using transcription elongation complex display.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Article
- Evaluating Performance of Different RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Programs Using Self-cleaving Ribozymes.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Predicting RNA distance-based contact maps by integrated deep learning on physics-inferred secondary structure and evolutionary-derived mutational coupling.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Experimental Resurrection of Ancestral Mammalian CPEB3 Ribozymes Reveals Deep Functional Conservation.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- DiMSum: an error model and pipeline for analyzing deep mutational scanning data and diagnosing common experimental pathologies.Genome biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the large number of noncoding RNAs in human genome and their roles in many diseases include cancer, we know very little about them due to lack of structural clues. The centerpiece of the structural clues is the full RNA base-pairing structure of secondary and tertiary contacts that can be precisely obtained only from costly and time-consuming 3D structure determination. Here, we performed deep mutational scanning of self-cleaving CPEB3 ribozyme by error-prone PCR and showed that a library of <5 × 104 single-to-triple mutants is sufficient to infer 25 of 26 base pairs including non-nested, nonhelical, and noncanonical base pairs with both sensitivity and precision at 96%. Such accurate inference was further confirmed by a twister ribozyme at 100% precision with only noncanonical base pairs as false negatives. The performance was resulted from analyzing covariation-induced deviation of activity by utilizing both functional and nonfunctional variants for unsupervised classification, followed by Monte Carlo (MC) simulated annealing with mutation-derived scores. Highly accurate inference can also be obtained by combining MC with evolution/direct coupling analysis, R-scape or epistasis analysis. The results highlight the usefulness of deep mutational scanning for high-accuracy structural inference of self-cleaving ribozymes with implications for other structured RNAs that permit high-throughput functional selections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.