Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31872209›Full record

ReviewBiochemical Society transactions2020

Editor's cut: DNA cleavage by CRISPR RNA-guided nucleases Cas9 and Cas12a.

Thomas Swartjes, Raymond H J Staals, John van der Oost

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochemical Society transactions, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Molecular mechanisms and biotechnology applications of CRISPR-Cas12a.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Comparison of CRISPR-MAD7 and CRISPR-Cas9 for Gene Disruptions inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. MgProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas SwartjesLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE Wageningen, Netherlands.
Raymond H J StaalsLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE Wageningen, Netherlands.
John van der OostLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE Wageningen, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discovered as an adaptive immune system of prokaryotes, CRISPR-Cas provides many promising applications. DNA-cleaving Cas enzymes like Cas9 and Cas12a, are of great interest for genome editing. The specificity of these DNA nucleases is determined by RNA guides, providing great targeting adaptability. Besides this general method of programmable DNA cleavage, these nucleases have different biochemical characteristics, that can be exploited for different applications. Although Cas nucleases are highly promising, some room for improvement remains. New developments and discoveries like base editing, prime editing, and CRISPR-associated transposons might address some of these challenges.

Indexed as

DNA CleavageAdaptive ImmunityBacterial ProteinsClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsCRISPR-Associated Protein 9CRISPR-Associated ProteinsCRISPR-Cas SystemsDeoxyribonucleasesDNA-Binding ProteinsEndodeoxyribonucleasesGene EditingHumansRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsBacterial ProteinsCas12a proteinCRISPR-Associated Protein 9CRISPR-Associated ProteinsDeoxyribonucleasesDNA-Binding ProteinsEndodeoxyribonucleasesRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsbiotechnologyCRISPRDNA bindingendonucleasesgenome editingnon-coding RNA

Identifiers

PMID31872209
PMCPMC7054755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.