ArticleParasite epidemiology and control2019
Seroprevalence of circulating taeniid antigens in pigs and associated risk factors in Kongwa district, Tanzania.
Article in Parasite epidemiology and control, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Elucidating the causal mechanisms of Taenia solium transmission in humans, pigs and the environment: A global systematic review.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Pooled it
- Epidemiology of Porcine Cysticercosis in Eastern and Southern Africa: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2022Pooled it
- Seroprevalence, spatial clustering, and gender-associated risk factors of porcine cysticercosis in backyard pigs from the high Andean region of Perú: A One Health approach.Veterinary world · 2026Article
- Prevalence and risk factors associated with Taenia solium cysticercosis in pigs in Oyam district, Uganda.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Environmental contamination with taeniid cestode eggs: A systematic literature review.Food and waterborne parasitology · 2025Review
- Seroprevalence and risk factors of porcine cysticercosis in Mpwapwa district, eastern-Central Tanzania.Parasite epidemiology and control · 2025Article
- Effect of Community Health Education Intervention on Prevalence and Pig Farmers' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Related to Porcine Cysticercosis in Selected Areas of Tanzania.Veterinary medicine international · 2025Article
- Seroprevalence and risk factors forFood and waterborne parasitology · 2023Article
- Community Health-Education Intervention Trial against HumanPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Quantitative risk assessment for humanVeterinary world · 2023Article
- Detection of Porcine Cysticercosis in Meat Juice Samples from Infected Pigs.Acta parasitologica · 2021Article
- Socio-economic and health costs of porcine/human cysticercosis, neurocysticercosis and epilepsy to small-scale pig producers in Tanzania.Bulletin of the National Research Centre · 2021Review
- Soil contamination by Taenia solium egg DNA in rural villages in Kongwa district, Tanzania.Infection ecology & epidemiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate exposure to porcine cysticercosis (PC) and associated risk factors in the Kongwa District, eastern-central Tanzania. For the first time a cross-sectional investigation of the seroprevalence in pigs using a commercial genus specific cysticercosis enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (apDia Ag-ELISA) was undertaken in eastern-central Tanzania. Moreover, the identity of suspected
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.