Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31871910›Full record

ArticleAnnals of global health2019

Developmental Outcomes of Preterm and Low Birth Weight Toddlers and Term Peers in Rwanda.

Alain Ahishakiye, Marie Claire Abimana, Kathryn Beck, Ann C Miller, Theresa S Betancourt, Hema Magge, Christine Mutaganzwa, Catherine M Kirk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of global health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alain Ahishakiye *Rwinkwavu District Hospital, Ministry of Health, Rwinkwavu, RW.
Marie Claire Abimana *Partners In Health/Inshuti Mu Buzima, Rwinkwavu, RW.
Kathryn BeckPartners In Health/Inshuti Mu Buzima, Rwinkwavu, RW.
Ann C MillerDivision of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, US.
Theresa S BetancourtSchool of Social Work, Boston College, Boston, US.
Hema MaggeDivision of General Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, US.
Christine MutaganzwaPartners In Health/Inshuti Mu Buzima, Rwinkwavu, RW.
Catherine M KirkPartners In Health/Inshuti Mu Buzima, Rwinkwavu, RW.
Partners In Health · USBoston Children's Hospital · USBoston College · USHarvard Global Health Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: As neonatal care improves in low-resource settings, more preterm or low birth weight (LBW) babies are surviving, but little is known about their long-term outcomes. Globally, preterm and/or LBW babies are at increased risk of mortality, malnutrition, and developmental delay. Objectives: We aim to describe the differences in development in rural Rwandan children at 24-36 months of age born preterm and/or LBW compared to their peers born term or normal birth weight (term/NBW), and to assess factors associated with poor development. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using secondary data analysis from two combined datasets from 2014, using Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ-3) for developmental assessment and anthropometrics for nutritional status (stunting and wasting). Demographic and clinical factors associated with poor developmental outcomes in univariate regression at α = 0.20 were included in a full model; we used backward stepwise penalized multivariable logistic regression to identify a final model at α = 0.05. Findings: In total, 445 children were included; 405 term/NBW, and 40 preterm and/or LBW. Half of them (n = 234; 52.6%) had developmental delay, including 207 (51.1%) among term/NBW and 27 (67.5%) among preterm and/or LBW (p = 0.048). In the final model, term/NBW children with stunting alone had a significant increase in the odds of developmental delay (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.37-3.07), and children with wasting had a borderline statistically significant increased odds of developmental delay (OR 5.79, 95% CI 0.98-34.39). Being preterm and/or LBW and not stunted completely predicted delay. Conclusion: Half of the children had developmental delay in our sample from rural Rwanda. Preterm and/or LBW infants were more likely to have developmental delay, and the main predictor of developmental delay was stunting, with high rates of stunting observed also in term/NBW infants. Interventions to reduce undernutrition and prevent prematurity and LBW, alongside investments to promote early stimulation for optimal development, are needed if gains in addressing developmental delay are to be made.

Indexed as

Infant, Low Birth WeightInfant, PrematureBirth WeightCase-Control StudiesChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDevelopmental DisabilitiesFemaleGrowth DisordersHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMalnutritionMultivariate AnalysisNutritional StatusOdds Ratio

Identifiers

PMID31871910
PMCPMC6923771
OpenAlexW2996351685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.