Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31871837›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

Social information affects Canada goose alert and escape responses to vehicle approach: implications for animal-vehicle collisions.

Bradley F Blackwell, Thomas W Seamans, Travis L DeVault, Steven L Lima, Morgan B Pfeiffer, Esteban Fernández-Juricic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A model to quantify the probability of collision between birds and aircraft: Applications for onboard lighting.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bradley F BlackwellNational Widlife Research Center, Wildlife Services, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Sandusky, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2628-8933
Thomas W SeamansNational Widlife Research Center, Wildlife Services, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Sandusky, OH, USA.
Travis L DeVaultNational Widlife Research Center, Wildlife Services, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Sandusky, OH, USA.
Steven L LimaDepartment of Biology, Indiana State University, Terre Haute, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6207-4588
Morgan B PfeifferNational Widlife Research Center, Wildlife Services, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Sandusky, OH, USA.
Esteban Fernández-JuricicDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnimal-vehicle collisions represent substantial sources of mortality for a variety of taxa and can pose hazards to property and human health. But there is comparatively little information available on escape responses by free-ranging animals to vehicle approach versus predators/humans.

methodsWe examined responses (alert distance and flight-initiation distance) of focal Canada geese (

resultsWe found that both categorical factors interacted to affect alert and escape behaviors. Focal geese used mostly personal information to become alert to the vehicle under high risk scenarios (direct approach), but they combined personal and social information to become alert in low risk scenarios (tangential approach). Additionally, when social information was not available from the companion group, focal birds escaped at greater distances under direct compared to tangential approaches. However, when the companion group could see the vehicle approaching, focal birds escaped at similar distances irrespective of vehicle direction. Finally, geese showed a greater tendency to take flight when the vehicle approached directly, as opposed to a side step or walking away from the vehicle.

conclusionsWe suggest that the perception of risk to vehicle approach (likely versus unlikely collision) is weighted by the availability of social information in the group; a phenomenon not described before in the context of animal-vehicle interactions. Notably, when social information is available, the effects of heightened risk associated with a direct approach might be reduced, leading to the animal delaying the escape, which could ultimately increase the chances of a collision. Also, information on a priori escape distances required for surviving a vehicle approach (based on species behavior and vehicle approach speeds) can inform planning, such as location of designated cover or safe areas. Future studies should assess how information from vehicle approach flows within a flock, including aspects of vehicle speed and size, metrics that affect escape decision-making.

Indexed as

Animal–aircraft collisionsAnimal–vehicle collisionsEscape behaviorFlight-initiation distancePerceived riskSocial information

Identifiers

PMID31871837
PMCPMC6924344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.