ArticleNursing open2020
Relationships between the
Article in Nursing open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of a Nursing Process Training Program on Nurses' Knowledge and Skills in Primary Healthcare in Albania: A Quasi-Experimental Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Rest intolerance and associated factors among Chinese nursing students: a cross-sectional network analysis.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- "Eat Enough"-A nurse-led intervention to enhance hospitalized older adults' protein and energy nutrition.International journal of nursing knowledge · 2025Article
- The impact of institutionalizing the nursing process based on TPSN model on the quality and quantity of nursing diagnoses.Nursing open · 2023Article
- Enhancing nursing documentation in Kazakhstan: assessing utilization and standardization for improving patient care.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Systematization of perioperative nursing care in robotic surgery: instrument validation.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2023Article
- Standardization of Quality of Diagnoses, Interventions, and Outcomes (Q-DIO) Measurement Instrument for Use in Slovenia.Zdravstveno varstvo · 2022Article
- Evaluation of an educational intervention (edworkcases) involving clinical cases and Nursing students: a cross-sectional observational study.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2022Observational
- Culture in the spotlight-cultural adaptation and content validity of the integrated palliative care outcome scale for dementia: A cognitive interview study.Palliative medicine · 2021Article
- Relationships between theNursing open · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to assess (a) nurses' knowledge and their attitude towards the Advanced Nursing Process-nursing assessment, diagnoses, interventions, outcomes, (b) the quality of the Advanced Nursing Process and (c) relationships with patient characteristics. Design: A cross-sectional, descriptive correlational study was performed. Methods: Ninety-two registered nurses and ninety nursing records of six hospital wards were included. In January 2016, a knowledge test, a self-assessment tool for measuring nurses' attitude (PND) and the Results: Nurses demonstrated low levels of knowledge, positive attitudes and an average Advanced Nursing Process quality. Accurate nursing diagnoses were strong and highly significantly related to effective nursing interventions and better nursing-sensitive patient outcomes. A higher proportion of registered nurses was related to better nursing outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.