Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31871654›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2019

An assessment of human impacts on endangered red pandas (

Saroj Panthi, Tiejun Wang, Yiwen Sun, Arjun Thapa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Cerebral infarction in red panda (Ailurus fulgens).The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Improved Trapping and Handling of an Arboreal, Montane Mammal: Red PandaAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Saroj PanthiMinistry of Industry, Tourism Forest, and Environment Pokhara Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1502-7711
Tiejun WangDepartment of Natural Resources Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC) University of Twente Enschede The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1138-8464
Yiwen SunDepartment of Natural Resources Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC) University of Twente Enschede The Netherlands.
Arjun ThapaSmall Mammals Conservation and Research Foundation Kathmandu Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthropogenic factors play an important role in shaping the distribution of wildlife species and their habitats, and understanding the influence of human activities on endangered species can be key to improving conservation efforts as well as the implementation of national strategies for sustainable development. Here, we used species distribution modeling to assess human impacts on the endangered red panda (

Indexed as

anthropogenic variablesdistance to pathecological niche modelhabitat suitabilityhuman population densitylivestock density

Identifiers

PMID31871654
PMCPMC6912920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.