Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31871397›Full record

ArticleJournal of aggression, maltreatment & trauma2019

Patterns of adolescent aggression and victimization: Sex differences and correlates.

H Luz McNaughton Reyes, Vangie A Foshee, May Chen, Susan T Ennett

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of aggression, maltreatment & trauma, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Underlying Familial Factors for Aggressive Behavior in Romantic Relationships: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Codevelopment of Delinquency, Alcohol Use, and Aggression Toward Peers and Dates: Multitrajectory Patterns and Predictors.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H Luz McNaughton ReyesDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Vangie A FosheeDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
May ChenDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Susan T EnnettDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Teen Dating Violence: Identifying Heterogeneity Using Person-Centered ApproachesR21HD087781 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI REYES, H. LUZ MCNAUGHTON · 2016 to 2017
$375k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD087781
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study identified heterogenous patterns of peer and dating aggression and victimization among boys and girls and examined their relation to risk and protective correlates. Girls (n=1648) and boys (n=1420) in grades 8-10 completed surveys assessing 14 indicators of violence involvement. Latent class analyses indicated a four-class solution, though a test of measurement invariance indicated the nature of the classes differed by sex. Among boys and girls, three classes emerged:

Indexed as

dating violencelatent class analysispeer violencesex differencesTypologies

Identifiers

PMID31871397
PMCPMC6927675
OpenAlexW2800674527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.