Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31871127›Full record

ReviewEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2019

The future of bronchodilation: looking for new classes of bronchodilators.

Mario Cazzola, Paola Rogliani, Maria Gabriella Matera

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Perspectives on Ensifentrine and Its Therapeutic Potential in the Treatment of COPD: Evidence to Date.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Ensifentrine as a Novel, Inhaled Treatment for Patients with COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. The future of inhalation therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Current research in pharmacology and drug discovery · 2022
    Review
  14. Drug interaction and chronic obstructive respiratory disorders.Current research in pharmacology and drug discovery · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. New Avenues for Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors in Asthma.Journal of experimental pharmacology · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mario CazzolaDept of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy mario.cazzola@uniroma2.it.
Paola RoglianiDept of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7801-5040
Maria Gabriella MateraDept of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Available bronchodilators can satisfy many of the needs of patients suffering from airway disorders, but they often do not relieve symptoms and their long-term use raises safety concerns. Therefore, there is interest in developing new classes that could help to overcome the limits that characterise the existing classes.At least nine potential new classes of bronchodilators have been identified: 1) selective phosphodiesterase inhibitors; 2) bitter-taste receptor agonists; 3) E-prostanoid receptor 4 agonists; 4) Rho kinase inhibitors; 5) calcilytics; 6) agonists of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ; 7) agonists of relaxin receptor 1; 8) soluble guanylyl cyclase activators; and 9) pepducins. They are under consideration, but they are mostly in a preclinical phase and, consequently, we still do not know which classes will actually be developed for clinical use and whether it will be proven that a possible clinical benefit outweighs the impact of any adverse effect.It is likely that if developed, these new classes may be a useful addition to, rather than a substitution of, the bronchodilator therapy currently used, in order to achieve further optimisation of bronchodilation.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsBronchodilator AgentsFemaleForecastingHumansMaleMuscarinic AntagonistsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsBronchodilator AgentsMuscarinic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID31871127
PMCPMC9488694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.