Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31871105›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2020

Adherence to Dietary Recommendations among Long-Term Breast Cancer Survivors and Cancer Outcome Associations.

Fei Wang, Hui Cai, Kai Gu, Liang Shi, Danxia Yu, Minlu Zhang, Wei Zheng, Ying Zheng, Pingping Bao, Xiao-Ou Shu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Fei WangDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Hui CaiDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Kai GuDepartment of Cancer Control and Prevention, Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1028-1868
Liang ShiDepartment of Cancer Control and Prevention, Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, China.
Danxia YuDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.ORCID 0000-0002-1710-9382
Minlu ZhangDepartment of Cancer Control and Prevention, Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, China.
Wei ZhengDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Ying ZhengDepartment of Cancer Prevention, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Pingping BaoDepartment of Cancer Control and Prevention, Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, China.
Xiao-Ou ShuDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. xiao-ou.shu@vanderbilt.edu.
Shanghai Municipal Center For Disease Control Prevention · CNVanderbilt University Medical Center · USFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNSecond Hospital of Shandong University · CN

Funding

Breast Cancer Survival: Lifestyle and Genetic DeterminantsR01CA118229 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI SHU, XIAO-OU · 2007 to 2010
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA118229
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdherence to dietary recommendations has been shown to be associated with reduced mortality in healthy populations. Little is known about the possible benefits of adherence to dietary recommendations among breast cancer survivors.

methodsDietary information was collected using food frequency questionnaires at the 5-year postdiagnosis survey in 3,450 5-year breast cancer survivors from the Shanghai Breast Cancer Survival Study. Adherence scores to Chinese Food Pagoda (CHFP)-2007, CHFP-2016, modified Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH), and Healthy Eating Index 2015 (HEI-2015) were created. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for total mortality and breast cancer-specific events according to adherence scores.

resultsParticipants in the highest quartiles of CHFP-2007, CHFP-2016, and DASH had 25% to 34% lower risk of total mortality (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48-0.89 for CHFP-2007; HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.55-1.01 for CHFP-2016; HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49-0.91 for DASH), and 36% to 40% lower risk of breast cancer-specific events (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.44-0.93 for CHFP-2007; HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.45-0.99 for CHFP-2016; HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.40-0.90 for DASH) comparing with the lowest quartiles. Associations did not vary by known prognostic factors. HEI-2015 scores were not significantly associated with breast cancer outcomes.

conclusionsHigher adherence to CHFP and DASH dietary guidelines post-cancer diagnosis was associated with reduced risk of both overall death and breast cancer-specific recurrence or death among long-term breast cancer survivors. IMPACT: Our study highlights the importance of overall dietary quality among long-term breast cancer survivors.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsChinaDiet SurveysFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGuidelines as TopicHumansLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPatient CompliancePrognosis

Identifiers

PMID31871105
PMCPMC7007374
OpenAlexW2997894512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.