Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31870399›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2019

Effects of supraspinal feedback on human gait: rhythmic auditory distortion.

Arturo Forner-Cordero, João Pedro Pinho, Guilherme Umemura, João Carlos Lourenço, Bruno Mezêncio, Cinthia Itiki, Hermano Igo Krebs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Inducing asymmetric gait in healthy walkers: a review.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Autonomous Control of Music to Retrain Walking After Stroke.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2023
    Article
  8. Effects of a Music-Based Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation on Gait and Balance in Subacute Stroke.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Arturo Forner-CorderoBiomechatronics Laboratory, Department of Mechatronics and Mechanical Systems of the Escola Politécnica, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil. aforner@usp.br.ORCID 0000-0002-0352-1640
João Pedro PinhoBiomechatronics Laboratory, Department of Mechatronics and Mechanical Systems of the Escola Politécnica, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Guilherme UmemuraBiomechatronics Laboratory, Department of Mechatronics and Mechanical Systems of the Escola Politécnica, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
João Carlos Lourenço
Bruno MezêncioBiomechanics Laboratory of the Escola de Educação Física e Esportes, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Cinthia ItikiDepartment of Telecommunications and Control Engineering of the Escola Politécnica, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Hermano Igo KrebsDept. of Mechanical Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA02139, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferent types of sound cues have been used to adapt the human gait rhythm. We investigated whether young healthy volunteers followed subliminal metronome rhythm changes during gait.

methodsTwenty-two healthy adults walked at constant speed on a treadmill following a metronome sound cue (period 566 msec). The metronome rhythm was then either increased or decreased, without informing the subjects, at 1 msec increments or decrements to reach, respectively, a low (596 msec) or a high frequency (536 msec) plateaus. After 30 steps at one of these isochronous conditions, the rhythm returned to the original period with decrements or increments of 1 msec. Motion data were recorded with an optical measurement system to determine footfall. The relative phase between sound cue (stimulus) and foot contact (response) were compared.

resultsGait was entrained to the rhythmic auditory stimulus and subjects subconsciously adapted the step time and length to maintain treadmill speed, while following the rhythm changes. In most cases there was a lead error: the foot contact occurred before the sound cue. The mean error or the absolute mean relative phase increased during the isochronous high (536 msec) or low frequencies (596 msec).

conclusionThese results showed that the gait period is strongly "entrained" with the first metronome rhythm while subjects still followed metronome changes with larger error. This suggests two processes: one slow-adapting, supraspinal oscillator with persistence that predicts the foot contact to occur ahead of the stimulus, and a second fast process linked to sensory inputs that adapts to the mismatch between peripheral sensory input (foot contact) and supraspinal sensory input (auditory rhythm).

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdaptation, PhysiologicalCuesFemaleGaitHealthy VolunteersHumansMalePsychomotor PerformanceWalkingYoung AdultCentral pattern generatorGait rhythm controlLocomotionSubliminal gait adaptation

Identifiers

PMID31870399
PMCPMC6929305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.