Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31870390›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2019

Individualized feedback to change multiple gait deficits in chronic stroke.

Kevin A Day, Kendra M Cherry-Allen, Amy J Bastian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kevin A DayCenter for Movement Studies, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA. kday8@jhmi.edu.
Kendra M Cherry-AllenCenter for Movement Studies, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Amy J BastianCenter for Movement Studies, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

NICHD MENTAL RETARDATION RESEARCH CENTER CORE GRANTP30HD024061 · NICHD · KENNEDY KRIEGER CHILDRENS HOSPITAL · PI VALLE, DAVID · 1988 to 2013
$15.8M
BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007057 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KANOLD, PATRICK O, KARCHIN, RACHEL · 1985 to 2023
$10.4M
Human Locomotor Plasticity in Health and DiseaseR37NS090610 · NINDS · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI BASTIAN, AMY J. · 2015 to 2020
$3.3M
NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD024061NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007057NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS090610
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWalking deficits in people post-stroke are often multiple and idiosyncratic in nature. Limited patient and therapist resources necessitate prioritization of deficits such that some may be left unaddressed. More efficient delivery of therapy may alleviate this challenge. Here, we look to determine the utility of a novel principal component-based visual feedback system that targets multiple, patient-specific features of gait in people post-stroke.

methodsTen individuals with stroke received two sessions of visual feedback to attain a walking goal. This goal consisted of bilateral knee and hip joint angles of a typical 'healthy' walking pattern. The feedback system uses principal component analysis (PCA) to algorithmically weight each of the input features so that participants received one stream of performance feedback. In the first session, participants had to explore different patterns to achieve the goal, and in the second session they were informed of the goal walking pattern. Ten healthy, age-matched individuals received the same paradigm, but with a hemiparetic goal (i.e. to produce the pattern of an exemplar stroke participant). This was to distinguish the extent to which performance limitations in stroke were due neurological injury or the PCA based visual feedback itself.

resultsPrincipal component-based visual feedback can differentially bias multiple features of walking toward a prescribed goal. On average, individuals with stroke typically improved performance via increased paretic knee and hip flexion, and did not perform better with explicit instruction. In contrast, healthy people performed better (i.e. could produce the desired exemplar stroke pattern) in both sessions, and were best with explicit instruction. Importantly, the feedback for stroke participants accommodated a heterogeneous set of walking deficits by individually weighting each feature based on baseline walking.

conclusionsPeople with and without stroke are able to use this novel visual feedback to train multiple, specific features of gait. Important for stroke, the PCA feedback allowed for targeting of patient-specific deficits. This feedback is flexible to any feature of walking in any plane of movement, thus providing a potential tool for therapists to simultaneously target multiple aberrant features of gait.

Indexed as

Biomechanical PhenomenaFeedback, SensoryFemaleGait Disorders, NeurologicHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrincipal Component AnalysisStrokeStroke RehabilitationBiofeedbackGait rehabilitationPCAReal-timeStrokeVisual feedback

Identifiers

PMID31870390
PMCPMC6929463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.