ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2019
Individualized feedback to change multiple gait deficits in chronic stroke.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Task-Dependent Performance of Wearable Multimodal Biofeedback in Physical Rehabilitation: A Longitudinal Post-Stroke Case Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Promoting Rehabilitation Using a Multimodal Internet of Things-Based Patient Monitoring System in a Smart Hospital.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2026Article
- Validity of Poststroke Gait Spatiotemporal and Joint Excursion Metrics Between Inertial Measurement Units and a Marker-Based System.Journal of applied biomechanics · 2025Article
- Within-session propulsion asymmetry changes have a limited effect on gait asymmetry post-stroke.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Explicit and implicit locomotor learning in individuals with chronic hemiparetic stroke.Journal of neurophysiology · 2024Article
- Serial engagement of distinct motor learning mechanisms to alter walking after stroke.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Explicit and implicit locomotor learning in individuals with chronic hemiparetic stroke.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Investigating the efficacy of a tactile feedback system to increase the gait speed of older adults.Human movement science · 2023Article
- Robotic Biofeedback for Post-Stroke Gait Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Review of Real-Time Biomechanical Feedback Systems in Sport and Rehabilitation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Visuomotor errors drive step length and step time adaptation during 'virtual' split-belt walking: the effects of reinforcement feedback.Experimental brain research · 2022Article
- Verbal feedback enhances motor learning during post-stroke gait retraining.Topics in stroke rehabilitation · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWalking deficits in people post-stroke are often multiple and idiosyncratic in nature. Limited patient and therapist resources necessitate prioritization of deficits such that some may be left unaddressed. More efficient delivery of therapy may alleviate this challenge. Here, we look to determine the utility of a novel principal component-based visual feedback system that targets multiple, patient-specific features of gait in people post-stroke.
methodsTen individuals with stroke received two sessions of visual feedback to attain a walking goal. This goal consisted of bilateral knee and hip joint angles of a typical 'healthy' walking pattern. The feedback system uses principal component analysis (PCA) to algorithmically weight each of the input features so that participants received one stream of performance feedback. In the first session, participants had to explore different patterns to achieve the goal, and in the second session they were informed of the goal walking pattern. Ten healthy, age-matched individuals received the same paradigm, but with a hemiparetic goal (i.e. to produce the pattern of an exemplar stroke participant). This was to distinguish the extent to which performance limitations in stroke were due neurological injury or the PCA based visual feedback itself.
resultsPrincipal component-based visual feedback can differentially bias multiple features of walking toward a prescribed goal. On average, individuals with stroke typically improved performance via increased paretic knee and hip flexion, and did not perform better with explicit instruction. In contrast, healthy people performed better (i.e. could produce the desired exemplar stroke pattern) in both sessions, and were best with explicit instruction. Importantly, the feedback for stroke participants accommodated a heterogeneous set of walking deficits by individually weighting each feature based on baseline walking.
conclusionsPeople with and without stroke are able to use this novel visual feedback to train multiple, specific features of gait. Important for stroke, the PCA feedback allowed for targeting of patient-specific deficits. This feedback is flexible to any feature of walking in any plane of movement, thus providing a potential tool for therapists to simultaneously target multiple aberrant features of gait.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.