Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31870330›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Mental health and its influencing factors among left-behind children in South China: a cross-sectional study.

Xiu Zhang, Mengjie Li, Li Guo, Yanna Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Chinese version ofFrontiers in psychiatry · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiu ZhangDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, No.74 Zhongshan Road II, Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Mengjie LiDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, No.74 Zhongshan Road II, Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Li GuoDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, No.74 Zhongshan Road II, Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, 510080, China. guoli@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Yanna ZhuDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, No.74 Zhongshan Road II, Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, 510080, China. zhuyn3@mail.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4160-3695

Funding

Science-Technology Foundation of Guangdong Province 2016A020223005the Women and Children's Foundation of Guangdong Province 5100071020195
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith rapid development of China's economy, there were over 68.7 million left-behind children (LBC) in China whose mental health has become a problem of public concern. The present cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the status of mental health and its associated factors of LBC aged 3-16 years old in both rural and urban areas.

methodsA total of 4187 children (aged 3-16), including 1471 LBC and 2716 non-left-behind children (NLBC), were recruited from 50 communities (22 in urban areas and 28 in rural areas) in Guangdong, China in August, 2014. The mental health problems were assessed using the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ).

resultsNo statistically significant difference of SDQ subscales scores about difficulties were found between LBC and NLBC on the whole participants as well as in rural areas or in urban areas within the same age group after adjustments were made (all p > 0.05). However, compared with NLBC in the same areas, urban LBC tended to have higher prosocial behaviours scores, while rural LBC had the lowest prosocial behaviours scores not only in the whole age group but also in different age subgroups (p < 0.05). Besides, compared with urban LBC, rural LBC were not worse in SDQ subscales scores except for prosocial behaviour at 7-9 age group (p = 0.003). Furthermore, higher paternal educational level and longer duration of parental absence, were associated with less difficulties in both rural and urban LBC. Besides, shorter duration of talk per-time but higher communication frequency were associated with less difficulties in rural LBC.

conclusionsThe present study demonstrated that in general, no difference of mental health problems were found between LBC and NLBC. Besides, longer duration of parental absence, shorter duration of talk per time but more communication frequency, and higher paternal educational level tend to have better development of mental health. The findings reinforce the importance of the stability of caregivers and the effective parent-child communication for Chinese rural LBC.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildChild, AbandonedChild, PreschoolChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthRisk FactorsRural PopulationUrban PopulationAgeCommunityLeft-behind childrenMental healthPlace of residence

Identifiers

PMID31870330
PMCPMC6929312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.