Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31870275›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019

RNA editing-based classification of diffuse gliomas: predicting isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation and chromosome 1p/19q codeletion.

Sean Chun-Chang Chen, Chung-Ming Lo, Shih-Hua Wang, Emily Chia-Yu Su

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sean Chun-Chang ChenGraduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 10675, Taiwan. seanchen@tmu.edu.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2030-7822
Chung-Ming LoGraduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 10675, Taiwan.
Shih-Hua WangGraduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 10675, Taiwan.
Emily Chia-Yu SuGraduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 10675, Taiwan.
Taipei Medical University · TW

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 105-2320-B-038-069Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 106-2221-E-038-017Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 107-2311-B-038-003-MY3)Taipei Medical University 105-AE1-B08
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate classification of diffuse gliomas, the most common tumors of the central nervous system in adults, is important for appropriate treatment. However, detection of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation and chromosome1p/19q codeletion, biomarkers to classify gliomas, is time- and cost-intensive and diagnostic discordance remains an issue. Adenosine to inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing has emerged as a novel cancer prognostic marker, but its value for glioma classification remains largely unexplored. We aim to (1) unravel the relationship between RNA editing and IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion and (2) predict IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion status using machine learning algorithms.

resultsBy characterizing genome-wide A-to-I RNA editing signatures of 638 gliomas, we found that tumors without IDH mutation exhibited higher total editing level compared with those carrying it (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, p < 0.0001). When tumor grade was considered, however, only grade IV tumors without IDH mutation exhibited higher total editing level. According to 10-fold cross-validation, support vector machines (SVM) outperformed random forest and AdaBoost (DeLong test, p < 0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of SVM in predicting IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion were 0.989 and 0.990, respectively. After performing feature selection, AUCs of SVM and AdaBoost in predicting IDH mutation were higher than that of random forest (0.985 and 0.983 vs. 0.977; DeLong test, p < 0.05), but AUCs of the three algorithms in predicting 1p/19q codeletion were similar (0.976-0.982). Furthermore, 67% of the six continuously misclassified samples by our 1p/19q codeletion prediction models were misclassifications in the original labelling after inspection of 1p/19q status and/or pathology report, highlighting the accuracy and clinical utility of our models.

conclusionsThe study represents the first genome-wide analysis of glioma editome and identifies RNA editing as a novel prognostic biomarker for glioma. Our prediction models provide standardized, accurate, reproducible and objective classification of gliomas. Our models are not only useful in clinical decision-making, but also able to identify editing events that have the potential to serve as biomarkers and therapeutic targets in glioma management and treatment.

Indexed as

RNA EditingBrain NeoplasmsChromosome AberrationsChromosomes, Human, Pair 1Chromosomes, Human, Pair 19GliomaHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMachine LearningMutationNeoplasm GradingIsocitrate DehydrogenaseClassificationGliomasIsocitrate dehydrogenaseMachine learningPrognosisRNA editing

Identifiers

PMID31870275
PMCPMC6929429
OpenAlexW2997784914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.