Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31870189›Full record

ArticleCephalalgia : an international journal of headache2020

Focus group findings on the migraine patient experience during research studies and ideas for future investigations.

Mia T Minen, Kaitlyn Morio, Kathryn Berlin Schaubhut, Scott W Powers, Richard B Lipton, Elizabeth Seng

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Development of a text message-based headache diary in adolescents and children.Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mia T MinenNYU Langone, New York, NY, USA.
Kaitlyn MorioNYU Langone, New York, NY, USA.
Kathryn Berlin SchaubhutNYU Langone, New York, NY, USA.
Scott W PowersCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Richard B LiptonAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Elizabeth SengAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
NYU Langone Health · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · US

Funding

Progressive Muscle Relaxation for Chronic Pain in an Acute Care SettingK23AT009706 · NCCIH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MINEN, MIA · 2018 to 2022
$923k
NCCIH NIH HHS K23 AT009706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe conducted focus groups in people who had participated in mobile health (mHealth) studies of behavioral interventions for migraine to better understand: (a) Participant experience in the recruitment/enrollment process; (b) participant experience during the studies themselves; (c) ideas for improving participant experience for future studies.

methodsWe conducted four focus groups in people who had agreed to participate in one of three studies involving mHealth and behavioral therapy for migraine. Inclusion criteria were being age 18-80, owning a smartphone, and having four or more headache days per month. All participants met the International Classification of Headache Disorders third edition beta version criteria for migraine. Exclusion criteria were not speaking English and having had behavioral therapy for migraine in the past year. Focus groups were audio recorded, fully transcribed and coded using general thematic analysis.

resultsThe 12 focus group participants had a mean age of 45 ± 15, a mean age of headache onset of 21 ± 13 and mean MIDAS disability score was 39 ± 56. Participants were women (100%), white (50%), Asian (33.3%) or members of other racial groups (16.7%). Certain themes emerged from each topic area. With regard to recruitment/enrollment (a), key themes were: (i) Participants joined their study out of an interest in research and/or a desire to try a new migraine treatment modality (behavioral therapy)

conclusionThough people with migraine are motivated to participate in mHealth and behavioral treatment studies, better communication up front about interventions as well as greater flexibility in interventions and follow-up methods are desired.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicFocus GroupsPatient Outcome AssessmentTelemedicineAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMigraine DisordersMobile ApplicationsSmartphonebehavioral therapymigrainemobile healthPatient engagementqualitative researchsmartphone

Identifiers

PMID31870189
PMCPMC7754244
OpenAlexW2997335381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.